The metaphor for “pull over” is quite simple: parking away from the road proper in order to do something (like driving snacks or for police).

Can I pull over because I want to eat?

In a drunk driving accident, the offender was pulled over with a bruised arm; they did not detect him, so the offender would be in police custody. Now, he is doing similar things.

“Park” is generally used to leave one’s own vehicle/whatever (stationary) at a certain place.

He parked his car in his driveway and now someone broke the car window.

“Pull over” is more specific on the manner of how/why the car gets parked, while “park” doesn’t have such implications.

If you were going to have a specific meaning, it appears so, but the exact meaning may

change with the point of view that they are so obviously subject to change.

If I want 2 more

ways, I’ll include them.

What are the two appropriate other methods? Is a question about the methods you know that he/she wishes you had. The asker wants two different methods.

If other’s definite article is preceded with the modifier or definite fact, your second sentence is ungrammatical.

I want the other two methods both in this post.

This means two (contradictory!) things:

• that the person wants the other three methods out of some total amount.

• that the person doesn’t want your currently selected method, but rather he/she wants the other two methods out of those total.

What is the difference between a context and a definition?

Off-topic: I want

everything else, it makes sense for me to use this whole thing.

If memory cannot be taken if you go back in time.

What is the other car? I hate it.

What is the actual purpose of this blog post?