“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

I understood the question to be about British usage, not general Spanish pronunciation… so here’s my crack at it.

1) and 2) As @mgb pointed out, the British are rather notorious for pronouncing foreign words in their own way, and the rest of the world be damned if we are only referring to English. Even on the BBC World Service, which is produced for foreign consumption, you will routinely hear heinous offenses committed against the Spanish, French, Italian, German, and Russian. Ibiza is the only tourist place which I can ask for confirmation.

I believe that the reason is that it’s a very popular British holiday destination; Britons on holiday (possibly drunk, and therefore in an unusually receptive condition) hear the local pronunciation and copy it. Compare to Zaragoza, which I have never heard a Briton pronounce as “Zaragoza”.

3) As far as I’m aware, Ibiza is the only example where I have to translate “Z” into “th.” When z appears in an English word, it is pronounced as the “z” in “zip”; when it appears in a Spanish word it’s generally pronounced as “s” (occasionally as “th” depending on the region and the reporter); when it appears in a German or Italian word, it’s pronounced as “ts” – most of the time. Sometimes they pronounce it as z in there too, and it makes me want to scream (obviously)

What does long answer make for more opinion?

Besides its “primary” verbal meaning (possession) “have” is used as a verb of necessity, as a near-synonym of “must”.

• I must go.

• I have to go. I really want it.

• I have to go. I’ve got no time to make it, I have to go.

What is the meaning of “have got to” when Americans use it as a “god.” Many other forms are almost as specific as ‘gotta’ and “have got in” in certain forms. Maybe it is a small part of the reason why Americans use it so less formally.

• When ya gotta go, ya gotta go!

• What is a dance?

What are the ways in which someone could improve their writing skills?

Can I fill out a form without data?

So “fill in” is done for the whole form; you can fill-in for the fields, just on the right hand side. And in all the fields…

“My, you’re filling out nicely, aren’t you? When applied to human beings a connotation of ripening or sexual maturation, and so it would be extremely creepy in most contexts other than the grandma/grandkid scenario. Edit: as @Jackson Pope reminded me, “filling out” can also mean “gaining weight”; however, I would still be very careful using this to refer to (for instance) a significant other, as it might lead to a night on the couch.

If “finding out well” should be used to refer to player rosters in music festival and competitions, etc. – things which start out empty but must be filled to get use. – Pitchfork Music Festival Filling Out Nicely One

can “fill in” for another person; that is, take over their duties while they are absent or unavailable. Bundy fills in for LA team second base coach William

Wallach.