“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?

“If I went there, I would be in trouble” does work, but not the subjunctive.
If I were to go there, I would be in trouble” instead – or were I to go there”, although that particular formation sounds a bit stilted and old-fashioned now.

What is the subjunctive (or as @Neil pointed out, a past tense) verb there instead of “would”?