Is Reductive?

I see Gary has commented “Reductio ad absurdum” but you could simply use “reductive” since each additional element in your statement reduces its impact.

Another example: “The boat sailed” is a strong statement but it is reductive to add “on the sea, which is made of water. I

watched some of the symbols and symbols printed on the pages but did not read any words and turned them into

words by turning the pages. I then read the words”

Is Reductive?

I see Gary has commented “Reductio ad absurdum” but you could simply use “reductive” since each additional element in your statement reduces its impact.

Another example: “The boat sailed” is a strong statement but it is reductive to add “on the sea, which is made of water. I

watched some of the symbols and symbols printed on the pages but did not read any words and turned them into

words by turning the pages. I then read the words”

Is Reductive?

I see Gary has commented “Reductio ad absurdum” but you could simply use “reductive” since each additional element in your statement reduces its impact.

Another example: “The boat sailed” is a strong statement but it is reductive to add “on the sea, which is made of water. I

watched some of the symbols and symbols printed on the pages but did not read any words and turned them into

words by turning the pages. I then read the words”

Is Reductive?

I see Gary has commented “Reductio ad absurdum” but you could simply use “reductive” since each additional element in your statement reduces its impact.

Another example: “The boat sailed” is a strong statement but it is reductive to add “on the sea, which is made of water. I

watched some of the symbols and symbols printed on the pages but did not read any words and turned them into

words by turning the pages. I then read the words”

Is Reductive?

I see Gary has commented “Reductio ad absurdum” but you could simply use “reductive” since each additional element in your statement reduces its impact.

Another example: “The boat sailed” is a strong statement but it is reductive to add “on the sea, which is made of water. I

watched some of the symbols and symbols printed on the pages but did not read any words and turned them into

words by turning the pages. I then read the words”

Is Reductive?

I see Gary has commented “Reductio ad absurdum” but you could simply use “reductive” since each additional element in your statement reduces its impact.

Another example: “The boat sailed” is a strong statement but it is reductive to add “on the sea, which is made of water. I

watched some of the symbols and symbols printed on the pages but did not read any words and turned them into

words by turning the pages. I then read the words”

Is Reductive?

I see Gary has commented “Reductio ad absurdum” but you could simply use “reductive” since each additional element in your statement reduces its impact.

Another example: “The boat sailed” is a strong statement but it is reductive to add “on the sea, which is made of water. I

watched some of the symbols and symbols printed on the pages but did not read any words and turned them into

words by turning the pages. I then read the words”

Is Reductive?

I see Gary has commented “Reductio ad absurdum” but you could simply use “reductive” since each additional element in your statement reduces its impact.

Another example: “The boat sailed” is a strong statement but it is reductive to add “on the sea, which is made of water. I

watched some of the symbols and symbols printed on the pages but did not read any words and turned them into

words by turning the pages. I then read the words”

Is Reductive?

I see Gary has commented “Reductio ad absurdum” but you could simply use “reductive” since each additional element in your statement reduces its impact.

Another example: “The boat sailed” is a strong statement but it is reductive to add “on the sea, which is made of water. I

watched some of the symbols and symbols printed on the pages but did not read any words and turned them into

words by turning the pages. I then read the words”

Is Reductive?

I see Gary has commented “Reductio ad absurdum” but you could simply use “reductive” since each additional element in your statement reduces its impact.

Another example: “The boat sailed” is a strong statement but it is reductive to add “on the sea, which is made of water. I

watched some of the symbols and symbols printed on the pages but did not read any words and turned them into

words by turning the pages. I then read the words”