0
Points
Questions
0
Answers
63
-
Asked on August 11, 2021 in Grammar.
Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?
What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.
E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..
I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a
certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.
I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than
that.
- 442511 views
- 461 answers
- 163785 votes
-
Asked on August 10, 2021 in Grammar.
Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?
What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.
E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..
I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a
certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.
I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than
that.
- 442511 views
- 461 answers
- 163785 votes
-
Asked on August 10, 2021 in Grammar.
Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?
What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.
E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..
I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a
certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.
I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than
that.
- 442511 views
- 461 answers
- 163785 votes
-
Asked on August 10, 2021 in Grammar.
Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?
What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.
E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..
I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a
certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.
I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than
that.
- 442511 views
- 461 answers
- 163785 votes
-
Asked on August 10, 2021 in Grammar.
Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?
What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.
E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..
I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a
certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.
I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than
that.
- 442511 views
- 461 answers
- 163785 votes
-
Asked on August 10, 2021 in Grammar.
Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?
What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.
E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..
I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a
certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.
I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than
that.
- 442511 views
- 461 answers
- 163785 votes
-
Asked on August 9, 2021 in Grammar.
Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?
What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.
E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..
I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a
certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.
I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than
that.
- 442511 views
- 461 answers
- 163785 votes
-
Asked on August 9, 2021 in Grammar.
Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?
What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.
E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..
I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a
certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.
I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than
that.
- 442511 views
- 461 answers
- 163785 votes
-
Asked on August 9, 2021 in Grammar.
Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?
What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.
E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..
I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a
certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.
I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than
that.
- 442511 views
- 461 answers
- 163785 votes
-
Asked on August 9, 2021 in Grammar.
Sometimes, you try to put too much into the same sentence. Break each thought out or your readers will become more confused reading it, than you are writing it. What was not asked right?
What should be consistent is tense; it doesn’t mean constant. Rather, the tense in a given sentence must always refer to the same temporal reference point.
E.g. : “The factor of achieving a great result, and /or in some cases the sum of all positive feelings. ” I came to realize…”You did something in the past.. I like to think twice..
I came to realize that technology had become indispensable” Thus, if your sentence was correct, the future looked a
certain way, “…it would continue to grow…” The best solution really is to express each idea separately.
I found that security was more important. Is security growing with the evolution of technologies? Don’t quote this one. What do you think about the Holocaust? What’s more, break things out, in a manner somewhat more elegant than
that.
- 442511 views
- 461 answers
- 163785 votes