What is

mean by time: ‘at’ with a specific point in time = “I will

arrive at 4:30″ Confusingly it’s ‘on’ with a day = “I will

arrive on Thursday” For places: ‘in’ with general areas, countries, cities etc.

= “I will arrive in Italy”, “I will arrive in Rome”

‘at’ with specific places = “I will arrive at the house”, “I will arrive at the airport”

You can use also use ‘in’ with a specific place if you mean specifically inside.
If I can meet you in a shop and say “I’ll meet you inside” then “I will meet you outside – but I will meet

you in the shop”.

What is

mean by time: ‘at’ with a specific point in time = “I will

arrive at 4:30″ Confusingly it’s ‘on’ with a day = “I will

arrive on Thursday” For places: ‘in’ with general areas, countries, cities etc.

= “I will arrive in Italy”, “I will arrive in Rome”

‘at’ with specific places = “I will arrive at the house”, “I will arrive at the airport”

You can use also use ‘in’ with a specific place if you mean specifically inside.
If I can meet you in a shop and say “I’ll meet you inside” then “I will meet you outside – but I will meet

you in the shop”.

I don’t know about the constitutional but in writing patents you are constantly writing “a plurality of….” to make it clear you mean more than one.

If the goal is to leave no possible argument for a lawyer to claim that states meant a single

state then the law does not rule that that is true.

I don’t know about the constitutional but in writing patents you are constantly writing “a plurality of….” to make it clear you mean more than one.

If the goal is to leave no possible argument for a lawyer to claim that states meant a single

state then the law does not rule that that is true.

I don’t know about the constitutional but in writing patents you are constantly writing “a plurality of….” to make it clear you mean more than one.

If the goal is to leave no possible argument for a lawyer to claim that states meant a single

state then the law does not rule that that is true.

I don’t know about the constitutional but in writing patents you are constantly writing “a plurality of….” to make it clear you mean more than one.

If the goal is to leave no possible argument for a lawyer to claim that states meant a single

state then the law does not rule that that is true.

I don’t know about the constitutional but in writing patents you are constantly writing “a plurality of….” to make it clear you mean more than one.

If the goal is to leave no possible argument for a lawyer to claim that states meant a single

state then the law does not rule that that is true.

I don’t know about the constitutional but in writing patents you are constantly writing “a plurality of….” to make it clear you mean more than one.

If the goal is to leave no possible argument for a lawyer to claim that states meant a single

state then the law does not rule that that is true.

Why should I leave out the neither way or I

can’t find the tool in the kitchen or the bathroom?

As an computer programmer, i.e. one tool in kitchen AND bathroom that I can use, I have a solution I can use.

Fringe is the decorative edging on something (like curtains) – hence something slightly fun and frivolous on the edge of the meeting is fringe.

Edinburgh Fringe is an underground fun thing along with the larger, official and more staid Royal Edinburgh Tattoo – the fringe is now the bigger media event!

What is your best pick for a day in business classes?