MetaEd♦'s Profile

1
Points

Questions
0

Answers
55

  • Is it true that if you rasterize a slide deck to an image and create a slide deck is you are rasterizing the deck?

    Rasterize and rip mean “convert line art to a rasterized image”.? Usually, the image is reproduced using pixels to approximate the original line art. If it is reconstructed using pixels it can become smaller and more realistic. TIFF or JPEG are suitable files for a printer, but these are not suitable other than computer’s printing or scanning capabilities.

    Rasterize means “an image described in a vector graphic format (shapes) and it into a raster image (pixels or dots] for output on a video display or printer, or for storage in a bitmap file format”. ( Wikipedia) The

    verb rip is related to rasterize but less well known. Why are the lines of a painting in postscript format populated with a comma-script in the art world? A RIP is used for printing PostScript, but can be used for any other process. To make a RIP, image can be used to print PostScript content. To make a RIP, the image has to be a document. When using rip to reverse the postscript image of a RIP (now an expression of rip), the verb rip originally meant rip, but has come to be used more loosely for rip-making of various other file formats.

    Rasterize’s parent word, raster, from the Latin rastrum, “rake”, ( OEtmD), originally a German electronics term meaning a series of rows “raked” out by a cathode ray tube’s electron beam. Is it related to rastrum, a five-pointed pen resembling a rake and used with musical staff lines?

    What are some best tips to save your money?

    • 865438 views
    • 6 answers
    • 321940 votes
  • Asked on March 5, 2021 in Phrases.

    I have tried to explain in Chinese to my girlfriend the symptoms her teeth have and suck up with me mouth-teeth. My tongue had to cover up my tongue and I couldn’t eat.

    What is the best way to describe this article:

    • 1066309 views
    • 6 answers
    • 400834 votes
  • Asked on March 2, 2021 in Grammar.

    In historical narratives, the verb “Be followed by a to-infinitive” is used to convey that something took place later than the narrative moment in the story. In your example,

    Many years later, as he faced the firing squad, Colonel Aureliano Buenda was to remember that distant afternoon when his father took him to discover ice.

    When was “he” to see ice? What then happened to Macondo, a small village of twenty adobe houses? And the narrative moment

    has already been established in Macondo’s youth, not in his later

    life?

    And here

    he was to remain until he died. Other examples (Earnest Brehaut, ” Introduction ” from his translation of Gregory of Tours’ History of the Franks )

    This was to be an eventful day for the travelers. (I.D. v. J. F. D’oro). “…the referenced events occurred after the narrative moment, when the day began. For the rest of his career, he was

    to brood on those events. Brittanica, English Literature: The Romantic Period “) .

    • 1175363 views
    • 2 answers
    • 420478 votes
  • Asked on March 1, 2021 in Other.

    I consulted 5 or 6 dictionaries linked from One Look. B. The Cambridge 1 Publication system (for both x and y), and all listed kibbutzim as the only plural form, except kibbutzes as the second plural form on x. All listed kibbutzim as the only plural form, except that Cambridge 1 did not recognize kibbutzes as a second plural form on x.

    Is it OK to be using kifbutzim? If you know a word well, you probably know the plural; anybody not knowing the word is likely to have to look it up anyway.

    If this word becomes well known, it will follow the usual pattern: it will appear less and less often in italics (used to indicate a foreign word), and more and more often with the English plural form instead of the Hebrew.

    • 1202416 views
    • 1 answers
    • 423463 votes
  • Asked on February 27, 2021 in Other.

    How did you take over your surroundings, including certain things.? Take over, means taken over.

    Not that the population of Mexico is overtaking the population of the US, but that the US population of Mexicans (implied to be “the bulk of the reproducing population”) is growing rapidly and that this trend will result in a Mexican takeover of the US.

    • 1262088 views
    • 4 answers
    • 430153 votes