Can this serve as a complement in order to be used in an overall relative clause? How do you make sentences work?

I chose the one who was trying to talk to you.

In GrammarGirl you would write both “The Man” and “The Man Who HAD TO Talk to You.”

The word that as a particular pronoun to mention a person has been quite common among authors.

I’m going to go with GrammarGirl in this opinion of hers..,.Its very good to see GrammarGirl go.. I hate GrammarGirl. Why are there so many studies about it?

What’s the point in using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human? I always think my friend who would only refer to his new stepmother as the woman that married my father, and he or she would be completely shocked at his or her presence. I think he was trying to express his animosity and you wouldn’t want to do that accidentally.

What do you think about the move from “apocalyptic” to a “normal”?

Can this serve as a complement in order to be used in an overall relative clause? How do you make sentences work?

I chose the one who was trying to talk to you.

In GrammarGirl you would write both “The Man” and “The Man Who HAD TO Talk to You.”

The word that as a particular pronoun to mention a person has been quite common among authors.

I’m going to go with GrammarGirl in this opinion of hers..,.Its very good to see GrammarGirl go.. I hate GrammarGirl. Why are there so many studies about it?

What’s the point in using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human? I always think my friend who would only refer to his new stepmother as the woman that married my father, and he or she would be completely shocked at his or her presence. I think he was trying to express his animosity and you wouldn’t want to do that accidentally.

What do you think about the move from “apocalyptic” to a “normal”?

Can this serve as a complement in order to be used in an overall relative clause? How do you make sentences work?

I chose the one who was trying to talk to you.

In GrammarGirl you would write both “The Man” and “The Man Who HAD TO Talk to You.”

The word that as a particular pronoun to mention a person has been quite common among authors.

I’m going to go with GrammarGirl in this opinion of hers..,.Its very good to see GrammarGirl go.. I hate GrammarGirl. Why are there so many studies about it?

What’s the point in using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human? I always think my friend who would only refer to his new stepmother as the woman that married my father, and he or she would be completely shocked at his or her presence. I think he was trying to express his animosity and you wouldn’t want to do that accidentally.

What do you think about the move from “apocalyptic” to a “normal”?

Can this serve as a complement in order to be used in an overall relative clause? How do you make sentences work?

I chose the one who was trying to talk to you.

In GrammarGirl you would write both “The Man” and “The Man Who HAD TO Talk to You.”

The word that as a particular pronoun to mention a person has been quite common among authors.

I’m going to go with GrammarGirl in this opinion of hers..,.Its very good to see GrammarGirl go.. I hate GrammarGirl. Why are there so many studies about it?

What’s the point in using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human? I always think my friend who would only refer to his new stepmother as the woman that married my father, and he or she would be completely shocked at his or her presence. I think he was trying to express his animosity and you wouldn’t want to do that accidentally.

What do you think about the move from “apocalyptic” to a “normal”?

Can this serve as a complement in order to be used in an overall relative clause? How do you make sentences work?

I chose the one who was trying to talk to you.

In GrammarGirl you would write both “The Man” and “The Man Who HAD TO Talk to You.”

The word that as a particular pronoun to mention a person has been quite common among authors.

I’m going to go with GrammarGirl in this opinion of hers..,.Its very good to see GrammarGirl go.. I hate GrammarGirl. Why are there so many studies about it?

What’s the point in using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human? I always think my friend who would only refer to his new stepmother as the woman that married my father, and he or she would be completely shocked at his or her presence. I think he was trying to express his animosity and you wouldn’t want to do that accidentally.

What do you think about the move from “apocalyptic” to a “normal”?

Can this serve as a complement in order to be used in an overall relative clause? How do you make sentences work?

I chose the one who was trying to talk to you.

In GrammarGirl you would write both “The Man” and “The Man Who HAD TO Talk to You.”

The word that as a particular pronoun to mention a person has been quite common among authors.

I’m going to go with GrammarGirl in this opinion of hers..,.Its very good to see GrammarGirl go.. I hate GrammarGirl. Why are there so many studies about it?

What’s the point in using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human? I always think my friend who would only refer to his new stepmother as the woman that married my father, and he or she would be completely shocked at his or her presence. I think he was trying to express his animosity and you wouldn’t want to do that accidentally.

What do you think about the move from “apocalyptic” to a “normal”?

Can this serve as a complement in order to be used in an overall relative clause? How do you make sentences work?

I chose the one who was trying to talk to you.

In GrammarGirl you would write both “The Man” and “The Man Who HAD TO Talk to You.”

The word that as a particular pronoun to mention a person has been quite common among authors.

I’m going to go with GrammarGirl in this opinion of hers..,.Its very good to see GrammarGirl go.. I hate GrammarGirl. Why are there so many studies about it?

What’s the point in using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human? I always think my friend who would only refer to his new stepmother as the woman that married my father, and he or she would be completely shocked at his or her presence. I think he was trying to express his animosity and you wouldn’t want to do that accidentally.

What do you think about the move from “apocalyptic” to a “normal”?

Can this serve as a complement in order to be used in an overall relative clause? How do you make sentences work?

I chose the one who was trying to talk to you.

In GrammarGirl you would write both “The Man” and “The Man Who HAD TO Talk to You.”

The word that as a particular pronoun to mention a person has been quite common among authors.

I’m going to go with GrammarGirl in this opinion of hers..,.Its very good to see GrammarGirl go.. I hate GrammarGirl. Why are there so many studies about it?

What’s the point in using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human? I always think my friend who would only refer to his new stepmother as the woman that married my father, and he or she would be completely shocked at his or her presence. I think he was trying to express his animosity and you wouldn’t want to do that accidentally.

What do you think about the move from “apocalyptic” to a “normal”?

Can this serve as a complement in order to be used in an overall relative clause? How do you make sentences work?

I chose the one who was trying to talk to you.

In GrammarGirl you would write both “The Man” and “The Man Who HAD TO Talk to You.”

The word that as a particular pronoun to mention a person has been quite common among authors.

I’m going to go with GrammarGirl in this opinion of hers..,.Its very good to see GrammarGirl go.. I hate GrammarGirl. Why are there so many studies about it?

What’s the point in using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human? I always think my friend who would only refer to his new stepmother as the woman that married my father, and he or she would be completely shocked at his or her presence. I think he was trying to express his animosity and you wouldn’t want to do that accidentally.

What do you think about the move from “apocalyptic” to a “normal”?

Can this serve as a complement in order to be used in an overall relative clause? How do you make sentences work?

I chose the one who was trying to talk to you.

In GrammarGirl you would write both “The Man” and “The Man Who HAD TO Talk to You.”

The word that as a particular pronoun to mention a person has been quite common among authors.

I’m going to go with GrammarGirl in this opinion of hers..,.Its very good to see GrammarGirl go.. I hate GrammarGirl. Why are there so many studies about it?

What’s the point in using that when you are talking about a person makes them seem less than human? I always think my friend who would only refer to his new stepmother as the woman that married my father, and he or she would be completely shocked at his or her presence. I think he was trying to express his animosity and you wouldn’t want to do that accidentally.

What do you think about the move from “apocalyptic” to a “normal”?