I don’t think it is necessary to complicate this: here, usually is acting as an actual adverb, that is, it’s modifying the verb ^1.

In the Greek mythology, witch is a homely woman, like the Asteroids. The witch has a strong connection to the Witch.

We left out any modifier, we’re saying the witch is always ugly and feminine.

In witch drama, a woman is usually a homely woman most of the time.

Now we’ve weakened our absolute statement slightly: we’re allowing for the possibility of the witch sometimes not being ugly and/or sometimes not being female.

1. The witch is usually a homely girl in a fairytale character.
2. In fairy tales, usually the witch is a homely woman.
3. In all of the supernatural tales, the witch is a homely woman.
4. In fairy tales the witch is a normally homely girl.
5. What are the some important stories about witches in kinfolk.org. The Witch is a homely woman usually.

Don’t change the meaning of 1, 2, 3, and 5 of this sentence? Depending on context and the specific adverb in question, they could change the emphasis, but in this case, in my opinion, I don’t think really see any nuances, other than #3 being slightly awkward. Does the 3 letter placement change the meaning of the verb? Also see #4, where the witch may be cute. If I’m the cliche witch, her homey vocation must be a good ending. I

need to explain this to you.

_{¹ The verb is is, by the way.}

Can you explain this to me?