Part of what you’re asking is rather deeply embedded in a complement clause. There is a lot going on there. Sometimes it helps to look at it in a less complicated context as if it is not complicated. So, consider 1) below. For example,

my friend already introduced an umbrella — when will the demand of it be so high?

In this example, we can construct the question in 2):

What is the demand for it going to be?

The academic style of talk. What is the demand for it going

to be like?

If we go back to 1), we can change the order of the noun-phrase constituents of the clause. Example 4) echoes 1) and example 5) shows that alternate constituent order.

5) The demand | for it | is going to be high. (= resurgence ). (= the demand for the items is going to be high).

5 The demand is going, will be very high | for it.

In the text you quote, in the highly complicated sentence where the form in question occurs, the speaker/writer choose word order 5) over word order 4). No both of these are more grammatical. Why is this form chosen more than other? There are rumor mills

today where some people use the word “hymn” to describe something. This is right.

Part of what you’re asking is rather deeply embedded in a complement clause. There is a lot going on there. Sometimes it helps to look at it in a less complicated context as if it is not complicated. So, consider 1) below. For example,

my friend already introduced an umbrella — when will the demand of it be so high?

In this example, we can construct the question in 2):

What is the demand for it going to be?

The academic style of talk. What is the demand for it going

to be like?

If we go back to 1), we can change the order of the noun-phrase constituents of the clause. Example 4) echoes 1) and example 5) shows that alternate constituent order.

5) The demand | for it | is going to be high. (= resurgence ). (= the demand for the items is going to be high).

5 The demand is going, will be very high | for it.

In the text you quote, in the highly complicated sentence where the form in question occurs, the speaker/writer choose word order 5) over word order 4). No both of these are more grammatical. Why is this form chosen more than other? There are rumor mills

today where some people use the word “hymn” to describe something. This is right.

Part of what you’re asking is rather deeply embedded in a complement clause. There is a lot going on there. Sometimes it helps to look at it in a less complicated context as if it is not complicated. So, consider 1) below. For example,

my friend already introduced an umbrella — when will the demand of it be so high?

In this example, we can construct the question in 2):

What is the demand for it going to be?

The academic style of talk. What is the demand for it going

to be like?

If we go back to 1), we can change the order of the noun-phrase constituents of the clause. Example 4) echoes 1) and example 5) shows that alternate constituent order.

5) The demand | for it | is going to be high. (= resurgence ). (= the demand for the items is going to be high).

5 The demand is going, will be very high | for it.

In the text you quote, in the highly complicated sentence where the form in question occurs, the speaker/writer choose word order 5) over word order 4). No both of these are more grammatical. Why is this form chosen more than other? There are rumor mills

today where some people use the word “hymn” to describe something. This is right.

Part of what you’re asking is rather deeply embedded in a complement clause. There is a lot going on there. Sometimes it helps to look at it in a less complicated context as if it is not complicated. So, consider 1) below. For example,

my friend already introduced an umbrella — when will the demand of it be so high?

In this example, we can construct the question in 2):

What is the demand for it going to be?

The academic style of talk. What is the demand for it going

to be like?

If we go back to 1), we can change the order of the noun-phrase constituents of the clause. Example 4) echoes 1) and example 5) shows that alternate constituent order.

5) The demand | for it | is going to be high. (= resurgence ). (= the demand for the items is going to be high).

5 The demand is going, will be very high | for it.

In the text you quote, in the highly complicated sentence where the form in question occurs, the speaker/writer choose word order 5) over word order 4). No both of these are more grammatical. Why is this form chosen more than other? There are rumor mills

today where some people use the word “hymn” to describe something. This is right.

Part of what you’re asking is rather deeply embedded in a complement clause. There is a lot going on there. Sometimes it helps to look at it in a less complicated context as if it is not complicated. So, consider 1) below. For example,

my friend already introduced an umbrella — when will the demand of it be so high?

In this example, we can construct the question in 2):

What is the demand for it going to be?

The academic style of talk. What is the demand for it going

to be like?

If we go back to 1), we can change the order of the noun-phrase constituents of the clause. Example 4) echoes 1) and example 5) shows that alternate constituent order.

5) The demand | for it | is going to be high. (= resurgence ). (= the demand for the items is going to be high).

5 The demand is going, will be very high | for it.

In the text you quote, in the highly complicated sentence where the form in question occurs, the speaker/writer choose word order 5) over word order 4). No both of these are more grammatical. Why is this form chosen more than other? There are rumor mills

today where some people use the word “hymn” to describe something. This is right.

Part of what you’re asking is rather deeply embedded in a complement clause. There is a lot going on there. Sometimes it helps to look at it in a less complicated context as if it is not complicated. So, consider 1) below. For example,

my friend already introduced an umbrella — when will the demand of it be so high?

In this example, we can construct the question in 2):

What is the demand for it going to be?

The academic style of talk. What is the demand for it going

to be like?

If we go back to 1), we can change the order of the noun-phrase constituents of the clause. Example 4) echoes 1) and example 5) shows that alternate constituent order.

5) The demand | for it | is going to be high. (= resurgence ). (= the demand for the items is going to be high).

5 The demand is going, will be very high | for it.

In the text you quote, in the highly complicated sentence where the form in question occurs, the speaker/writer choose word order 5) over word order 4). No both of these are more grammatical. Why is this form chosen more than other? There are rumor mills

today where some people use the word “hymn” to describe something. This is right.

The Great Forest or maybe Fangorn (but that would be to borrow from LoTR). How would you say “Rosengarth, meet me at the entrance of The Great Forest?

“

The Great Forest or maybe Fangorn (but that would be to borrow from LoTR). How would you say “Rosengarth, meet me at the entrance of The Great Forest?

“

Biologists often refer to a “common ancestor” when referring to a species which no longer exists, but from which two or more other species have evolved instead.

Small for Digital comments. Do we know the most recent common ancestor?

Biologists often refer to a “common ancestor” when referring to a species which no longer exists, but from which two or more other species have evolved instead.

Small for Digital comments. Do we know the most recent common ancestor?