Both the sentence sentences have the same grammar errors: the actions denoted by the verbs have been completed at a certain point of time in the past. So, the verbs should be in the past tense form. Die sentences can be corrected as:

1. Yet in the years since the late 1980s, gyrating oil prices – with the exception of a brief spike during the Gulf War – became a thing of the past.

2. The tower replaces the existing Tokyo Tower in 2011.

Is there any way to get a more positive response on social media?

Both the sentence sentences have the same grammar errors: the actions denoted by the verbs have been completed at a certain point of time in the past. So, the verbs should be in the past tense form. Die sentences can be corrected as:

1. Yet in the years since the late 1980s, gyrating oil prices – with the exception of a brief spike during the Gulf War – became a thing of the past.

2. The tower replaces the existing Tokyo Tower in 2011.

Is there any way to get a more positive response on social media?

Both the sentence sentences have the same grammar errors: the actions denoted by the verbs have been completed at a certain point of time in the past. So, the verbs should be in the past tense form. Die sentences can be corrected as:

1. Yet in the years since the late 1980s, gyrating oil prices – with the exception of a brief spike during the Gulf War – became a thing of the past.

2. The tower replaces the existing Tokyo Tower in 2011.

Is there any way to get a more positive response on social media?

Both the sentence sentences have the same grammar errors: the actions denoted by the verbs have been completed at a certain point of time in the past. So, the verbs should be in the past tense form. Die sentences can be corrected as:

1. Yet in the years since the late 1980s, gyrating oil prices – with the exception of a brief spike during the Gulf War – became a thing of the past.

2. The tower replaces the existing Tokyo Tower in 2011.

Is there any way to get a more positive response on social media?

Both the sentence sentences have the same grammar errors: the actions denoted by the verbs have been completed at a certain point of time in the past. So, the verbs should be in the past tense form. Die sentences can be corrected as:

1. Yet in the years since the late 1980s, gyrating oil prices – with the exception of a brief spike during the Gulf War – became a thing of the past.

2. The tower replaces the existing Tokyo Tower in 2011.

Is there any way to get a more positive response on social media?

Both the sentence sentences have the same grammar errors: the actions denoted by the verbs have been completed at a certain point of time in the past. So, the verbs should be in the past tense form. Die sentences can be corrected as:

1. Yet in the years since the late 1980s, gyrating oil prices – with the exception of a brief spike during the Gulf War – became a thing of the past.

2. The tower replaces the existing Tokyo Tower in 2011.

Is there any way to get a more positive response on social media?

Both the sentence sentences have the same grammar errors: the actions denoted by the verbs have been completed at a certain point of time in the past. So, the verbs should be in the past tense form. Die sentences can be corrected as:

1. Yet in the years since the late 1980s, gyrating oil prices – with the exception of a brief spike during the Gulf War – became a thing of the past.

2. The tower replaces the existing Tokyo Tower in 2011.

Is there any way to get a more positive response on social media?

With design our work ensures high-grade security for both computer and hardware attackers. Because

of the presence of the preposition’for’after’security’, the meaning of the sentence has become like ‘the design of our work ensures the security of the attackers (on behalf of them)?

The preposition with’security’ should be ‘against’: “The system is

designed to provide maximum security against toxic spills”

“The banks must tighten security against the fraud. I have already said that.” “There

is a difference in what the name of a given business is, and how does the business model fit in to it. “

With design our work ensures high-grade security for both computer and hardware attackers. Because

of the presence of the preposition’for’after’security’, the meaning of the sentence has become like ‘the design of our work ensures the security of the attackers (on behalf of them)?

The preposition with’security’ should be ‘against’: “The system is

designed to provide maximum security against toxic spills”

“The banks must tighten security against the fraud. I have already said that.” “There

is a difference in what the name of a given business is, and how does the business model fit in to it. “

Both the sentence sentences have the same grammar errors: the actions denoted by the verbs have been completed at a certain point of time in the past. So, the verbs should be in the past tense form. Die sentences can be corrected as:

1. Yet in the years since the late 1980s, gyrating oil prices – with the exception of a brief spike during the Gulf War – became a thing of the past.

2. The tower replaces the existing Tokyo Tower in 2011.

Is there any way to get a more positive response on social media?