Is

that the man are always called Peter?

I believe that Peter was the man who was the most influential (when referring to Peter) in the modern world, Peter (David).

Can you define Pete better

than Peter?

In line with what I think, I think that the man I’m designated ( that) called (on the phone, across, the road, or by another way) “Peter”. They are two different persons according to the Scriptures.

Who exactly was Peter Peter?

Who has Peter? Man and Peter are one person, and Peter is the only one.

The fact that you moderate your opinion using “I fear” or “i think” has no effect on the grammatical structure. If we had just said peter, what would we have use of the comma at the

beginning of a sentence?

Is that the man who is named Peter?

I think the object of the whole sentence: “that is the man who is called Peter” In

both sentences “who” is subject of “called” is called. The object of the paragraph is “which is called” If “who” is easier to use than “that”, then what can we do?

2

“Whom” is a relative pronoun that can only be used when the relative pronoun is object.

I saw someone talking to Peter.

In that case, the relative pronoun is object and we can use either “who”, “that”, or “whom” or omit the relative pronoun altogether.

Generally speaking, they will say that since the public pronoun standing for a person is an object we should only use the plural “whom”. Whom is very little used nowadays and sounds very formal. What do you think of using “who” as the relative pronoun object anymore?

I

believe “PJP”. What is the purpose of our “PJP”?

What is the difference between the verb “something” and the mutlative adjective “called”? I’d rather have a comma before I think. Please add longer commas at the end of your sentences.

What I believe is a “PJP” thing?

What is called PJP?

What is PJP.

( last paragraph edited after StoneyB’s comment )’

( last paragraph edited after StoneyB’s comment )

It is the usual way to say that John is going to buy some bread (or whatever else is sold there) from the baker’s shop. Even the cheese bakes are selling bread, and when it is the time to clean it up in the oven it is still very hot. Our dictionary uses the word shop. The phrase is implied or elaborative (by mistake, we know it’s there), but neither do we write it, or say it.
What is the relationship between a baker and his shop? The shop belongs to the baker. When we say he’s been to the baker’s, we’re talking about the bakery and not the cafe.

In the same way we could say:

I’m going to my aunt’s for the weekend.

I’m going to my aunt’s house. Leaving a mark at her house and saying “I’m going to see her someday.” When

you have a s, you have always the same grammatical

construction as ‘. If you say: John’s book.

In the latter “book” has to be expressed because we would not guess what is implied.

This is called the genitative. For more see here.

What is the need of the hour?

At and in are prepositions that express location and are followed by a noun phrase.
A car is at gate and parked. (Means the car stopped at the gate) —
A car arrived in the park. Is To a preposition that expresses a

consequence or is a purpose and will be followed by a verb clause.
Why was a car engine working but we didn’t walk all the way back home then found a few people on the bus and sped to assist us? Our car was not there, so did not have to go to the station of our choice.
– A taxi arrived to pick us up. If I wanted to collect him, I ordered a taxi, which came with the

purpose of
picking us up.) —Edit — I answered I’ve the same questions (text or email) as the second question. Use of to after arrive). As a verb as sto (place, then location), consciously to can express
location is often used: – I travel (drive(fly/swim/seat)

to work every weekday.