3
Points
Questions
1
Answers
444
-
Asked on December 23, 2021 in Grammar.
Gender inequality means that there is unfair treatment of people based on gender. What
are some examples?
Treating men and women differently (unfair or discrimination), or
2. How do I know if I can think of menvery well and female differently HTH?
(The above explanation may be over-simplified.However, as I understand it better now).
- 261705 views
- 11 answers
- 97485 votes
-
Asked on December 23, 2021 in Grammar.
Gender inequality means that there is unfair treatment of people based on gender. What
are some examples?
Treating men and women differently (unfair or discrimination), or
2. How do I know if I can think of menvery well and female differently HTH?
(The above explanation may be over-simplified.However, as I understand it better now).
- 261705 views
- 11 answers
- 97485 votes
-
Asked on December 22, 2021 in Meaning.
The only possible adjective is normally modifying was.
Normally, she was good at covering the
emotions she didn’t want to show,… or, with a difference in meaning, She was good
at covering the emotions she didn’t
want to show,. No other option works.
- 270452 views
- 13 answers
- 99682 votes
-
Asked on December 22, 2021 in Meaning.
The only possible adjective is normally modifying was.
Normally, she was good at covering the
emotions she didn’t want to show,… or, with a difference in meaning, She was good
at covering the emotions she didn’t
want to show,. No other option works.
- 270452 views
- 13 answers
- 99682 votes
-
Asked on December 21, 2021 in Meaning.
The only possible adjective is normally modifying was.
Normally, she was good at covering the
emotions she didn’t want to show,… or, with a difference in meaning, She was good
at covering the emotions she didn’t
want to show,. No other option works.
- 270452 views
- 13 answers
- 99682 votes
-
Asked on December 21, 2021 in Meaning.
The only possible adjective is normally modifying was.
Normally, she was good at covering the
emotions she didn’t want to show,… or, with a difference in meaning, She was good
at covering the emotions she didn’t
want to show,. No other option works.
- 270452 views
- 13 answers
- 99682 votes
-
Asked on December 21, 2021 in Meaning.
The only possible adjective is normally modifying was.
Normally, she was good at covering the
emotions she didn’t want to show,… or, with a difference in meaning, She was good
at covering the emotions she didn’t
want to show,. No other option works.
- 270452 views
- 13 answers
- 99682 votes
-
Asked on December 21, 2021 in Meaning.
The only possible adjective is normally modifying was.
Normally, she was good at covering the
emotions she didn’t want to show,… or, with a difference in meaning, She was good
at covering the emotions she didn’t
want to show,. No other option works.
- 270452 views
- 13 answers
- 99682 votes
-
Asked on December 21, 2021 in Single word requests.
The standard phrase in this context is “establish credibility”.
- 270707 views
- 7 answers
- 99743 votes
-
Asked on December 21, 2021 in Meaning.
The only possible adjective is normally modifying was.
Normally, she was good at covering the
emotions she didn’t want to show,… or, with a difference in meaning, She was good
at covering the emotions she didn’t
want to show,. No other option works.
- 270452 views
- 13 answers
- 99682 votes