“The patient presents with a uniform circular rash on > body part” would work for things like a rash. You can put details in between, for example “The > patient presents with…”.

Would work for things like a rash, you can put details in between, for example; “The patient presents with a uniform circular rash on > body part”, would work for things like a rash, you can put details in between, for example: “The patient presents with a uniform rash on > hand,

What is a “patient shows evidence of… works with things like jaundice,

concussion ect.

Do you have two sets of answers to a

• question?

What is the difference between interpretation and context?

“Both mathematicians have a professional discussion will definitely interpret the statements as quite different.”

Is it advisable for one to interpret a statement in this way?

Many mathematicians etc. know that “normally people” interpret it as the same. Some will treat that simply as an interesting fact of the ambiguity of language or some will

not.

Oddly enough, this pessimistic phenomenon shows up in mathematics.

The ‘Hairy Ball Theorem’ is quoted here by Jarvis & Tanton, i. It is impossible for

a ball to have the opposite tail shape, i. it is tangent to the surface of the ball, and ii) there are no hairy edges and the edges are uneven within of the ball. It is impossible to comb all the hairs so that each hair lies tangent to the surface of the ball, i. it is impossible to comb the tail in

Mathematically sound terminology can be’singular point’ but cowlick is the term commonly used for the non-technical sounding statements of the theorem.