0
Points
Questions
0
Answers
16
-
Asked on December 22, 2021 in American english.
In the Southern US, there is a common term for this kind of person. Is it a carpetbagger? The term was used after the Civil War to describe people who came from out-of-town, generally the North to describe how they carried their possessions – in a bag of carpet.
- 269784 views
- 11 answers
- 99602 votes
-
Asked on December 22, 2021 in American english.
In the Southern US, there is a common term for this kind of person. Is it a carpetbagger? The term was used after the Civil War to describe people who came from out-of-town, generally the North to describe how they carried their possessions – in a bag of carpet.
- 269784 views
- 11 answers
- 99602 votes
-
Asked on December 21, 2021 in American english.
In the Southern US, there is a common term for this kind of person. Is it a carpetbagger? The term was used after the Civil War to describe people who came from out-of-town, generally the North to describe how they carried their possessions – in a bag of carpet.
- 269784 views
- 11 answers
- 99602 votes
-
Asked on July 29, 2021 in Word choice.
Could is a conditional and past tense indicator of can but could
means both “were able to” and “would be able to” I
believe your confusion is involving the unique dual tense usage of this verb.
- 447159 views
- 22 answers
- 164193 votes
-
Asked on July 28, 2021 in Word choice.
Could is a conditional and past tense indicator of can but could
means both “were able to” and “would be able to” I
believe your confusion is involving the unique dual tense usage of this verb.
- 447159 views
- 22 answers
- 164193 votes
-
Asked on July 28, 2021 in Word choice.
Could is a conditional and past tense indicator of can but could
means both “were able to” and “would be able to” I
believe your confusion is involving the unique dual tense usage of this verb.
- 447159 views
- 22 answers
- 164193 votes
-
Asked on July 27, 2021 in Word choice.
Could is a conditional and past tense indicator of can but could
means both “were able to” and “would be able to” I
believe your confusion is involving the unique dual tense usage of this verb.
- 447159 views
- 22 answers
- 164193 votes
-
Asked on July 25, 2021 in Word choice.
Could is a conditional and past tense indicator of can but could
means both “were able to” and “would be able to” I
believe your confusion is involving the unique dual tense usage of this verb.
- 447159 views
- 22 answers
- 164193 votes
-
Asked on July 25, 2021 in Word choice.
Could is a conditional and past tense indicator of can but could
means both “were able to” and “would be able to” I
believe your confusion is involving the unique dual tense usage of this verb.
- 447159 views
- 22 answers
- 164193 votes
-
Asked on July 22, 2021 in Word choice.
Could is a conditional and past tense indicator of can but could
means both “were able to” and “would be able to” I
believe your confusion is involving the unique dual tense usage of this verb.
- 447159 views
- 22 answers
- 164193 votes