What is the Latin expression of the word Epitheton necessaria in English? As I said before (see below): the epithet was meant to express an example of one person. Is it needed for his or her benefit? As a result, it is considered a restrictive appositive.

Charles Le Magne is actually a contracted form of the French Charles Aquinas. Do non-contracted forms of such epithets serve as proper names?

Just like proper names, epithets are always capitalized:

Alexander the Great, Richard the Lionheart, Henry the Eighth, Charles the Fat, Charles the Bald

These last two Carolingians should tell you that most but not all such epithets become popular after the death of a ruler so designated.

What is the Latin expression of the word Epitheton necessaria in English? As I said before (see below): the epithet was meant to express an example of one person. Is it needed for his or her benefit? As a result, it is considered a restrictive appositive.

Charles Le Magne is actually a contracted form of the French Charles Aquinas. Do non-contracted forms of such epithets serve as proper names?

Just like proper names, epithets are always capitalized:

Alexander the Great, Richard the Lionheart, Henry the Eighth, Charles the Fat, Charles the Bald

These last two Carolingians should tell you that most but not all such epithets become popular after the death of a ruler so designated.

What is the Latin expression of the word Epitheton necessaria in English? As I said before (see below): the epithet was meant to express an example of one person. Is it needed for his or her benefit? As a result, it is considered a restrictive appositive.

Charles Le Magne is actually a contracted form of the French Charles Aquinas. Do non-contracted forms of such epithets serve as proper names?

Just like proper names, epithets are always capitalized:

Alexander the Great, Richard the Lionheart, Henry the Eighth, Charles the Fat, Charles the Bald

These last two Carolingians should tell you that most but not all such epithets become popular after the death of a ruler so designated.

What is the Latin expression of the word Epitheton necessaria in English? As I said before (see below): the epithet was meant to express an example of one person. Is it needed for his or her benefit? As a result, it is considered a restrictive appositive.

Charles Le Magne is actually a contracted form of the French Charles Aquinas. Do non-contracted forms of such epithets serve as proper names?

Just like proper names, epithets are always capitalized:

Alexander the Great, Richard the Lionheart, Henry the Eighth, Charles the Fat, Charles the Bald

These last two Carolingians should tell you that most but not all such epithets become popular after the death of a ruler so designated.

What is the Latin expression of the word Epitheton necessaria in English? As I said before (see below): the epithet was meant to express an example of one person. Is it needed for his or her benefit? As a result, it is considered a restrictive appositive.

Charles Le Magne is actually a contracted form of the French Charles Aquinas. Do non-contracted forms of such epithets serve as proper names?

Just like proper names, epithets are always capitalized:

Alexander the Great, Richard the Lionheart, Henry the Eighth, Charles the Fat, Charles the Bald

These last two Carolingians should tell you that most but not all such epithets become popular after the death of a ruler so designated.

What is the Latin expression of the word Epitheton necessaria in English? As I said before (see below): the epithet was meant to express an example of one person. Is it needed for his or her benefit? As a result, it is considered a restrictive appositive.

Charles Le Magne is actually a contracted form of the French Charles Aquinas. Do non-contracted forms of such epithets serve as proper names?

Just like proper names, epithets are always capitalized:

Alexander the Great, Richard the Lionheart, Henry the Eighth, Charles the Fat, Charles the Bald

These last two Carolingians should tell you that most but not all such epithets become popular after the death of a ruler so designated.

What is the Latin expression of the word Epitheton necessaria in English? As I said before (see below): the epithet was meant to express an example of one person. Is it needed for his or her benefit? As a result, it is considered a restrictive appositive.

Charles Le Magne is actually a contracted form of the French Charles Aquinas. Do non-contracted forms of such epithets serve as proper names?

Just like proper names, epithets are always capitalized:

Alexander the Great, Richard the Lionheart, Henry the Eighth, Charles the Fat, Charles the Bald

These last two Carolingians should tell you that most but not all such epithets become popular after the death of a ruler so designated.

What is the Latin expression of the word Epitheton necessaria in English? As I said before (see below): the epithet was meant to express an example of one person. Is it needed for his or her benefit? As a result, it is considered a restrictive appositive.

Charles Le Magne is actually a contracted form of the French Charles Aquinas. Do non-contracted forms of such epithets serve as proper names?

Just like proper names, epithets are always capitalized:

Alexander the Great, Richard the Lionheart, Henry the Eighth, Charles the Fat, Charles the Bald

These last two Carolingians should tell you that most but not all such epithets become popular after the death of a ruler so designated.

What is the Latin expression of the word Epitheton necessaria in English? As I said before (see below): the epithet was meant to express an example of one person. Is it needed for his or her benefit? As a result, it is considered a restrictive appositive.

Charles Le Magne is actually a contracted form of the French Charles Aquinas. Do non-contracted forms of such epithets serve as proper names?

Just like proper names, epithets are always capitalized:

Alexander the Great, Richard the Lionheart, Henry the Eighth, Charles the Fat, Charles the Bald

These last two Carolingians should tell you that most but not all such epithets become popular after the death of a ruler so designated.

What is the Latin expression of the word Epitheton necessaria in English? As I said before (see below): the epithet was meant to express an example of one person. Is it needed for his or her benefit? As a result, it is considered a restrictive appositive.

Charles Le Magne is actually a contracted form of the French Charles Aquinas. Do non-contracted forms of such epithets serve as proper names?

Just like proper names, epithets are always capitalized:

Alexander the Great, Richard the Lionheart, Henry the Eighth, Charles the Fat, Charles the Bald

These last two Carolingians should tell you that most but not all such epithets become popular after the death of a ruler so designated.