Jonathan Spirit's Profile

0
Points

Questions
0

Answers
20

  • What is the closest I can find to the mispronouncement of a word, but that having to do with pronunciation so it obviously isn’t the answer. It means to condemn. This is referred to as “denunciate”. All things that make you annoy? is the suffix for out or in-. E is a variation of ex-, meaning out. I am starting to see similarities here. If we have to use non-enunciate and disenunciate a word could we always go for that? Nonenunciate seems like the better answer as non means not. I’m a student now, I love reading books, but I can’t find any invented word for enunciation. What’s the origin for this word? I searched the Urban Dictionary search query on google, and there is a result for the city dictionary. I am not comfortable with using the Urban Dictionary for references on this website.

    There is even only a single opposite word to the word ‘enunciate’, and doesn’t matter. Why are there so many prefixes for everything?

    • 439237 views
    • 419 answers
    • 161661 votes
  • What is the closest I can find to the mispronouncement of a word, but that having to do with pronunciation so it obviously isn’t the answer. It means to condemn. This is referred to as “denunciate”. All things that make you annoy? is the suffix for out or in-. E is a variation of ex-, meaning out. I am starting to see similarities here. If we have to use non-enunciate and disenunciate a word could we always go for that? Nonenunciate seems like the better answer as non means not. I’m a student now, I love reading books, but I can’t find any invented word for enunciation. What’s the origin for this word? I searched the Urban Dictionary search query on google, and there is a result for the city dictionary. I am not comfortable with using the Urban Dictionary for references on this website.

    There is even only a single opposite word to the word ‘enunciate’, and doesn’t matter. Why are there so many prefixes for everything?

    • 439237 views
    • 419 answers
    • 161661 votes
  • What is the closest I can find to the mispronouncement of a word, but that having to do with pronunciation so it obviously isn’t the answer. It means to condemn. This is referred to as “denunciate”. All things that make you annoy? is the suffix for out or in-. E is a variation of ex-, meaning out. I am starting to see similarities here. If we have to use non-enunciate and disenunciate a word could we always go for that? Nonenunciate seems like the better answer as non means not. I’m a student now, I love reading books, but I can’t find any invented word for enunciation. What’s the origin for this word? I searched the Urban Dictionary search query on google, and there is a result for the city dictionary. I am not comfortable with using the Urban Dictionary for references on this website.

    There is even only a single opposite word to the word ‘enunciate’, and doesn’t matter. Why are there so many prefixes for everything?

    • 439237 views
    • 419 answers
    • 161661 votes
  • What is the closest I can find to the mispronouncement of a word, but that having to do with pronunciation so it obviously isn’t the answer. It means to condemn. This is referred to as “denunciate”. All things that make you annoy? is the suffix for out or in-. E is a variation of ex-, meaning out. I am starting to see similarities here. If we have to use non-enunciate and disenunciate a word could we always go for that? Nonenunciate seems like the better answer as non means not. I’m a student now, I love reading books, but I can’t find any invented word for enunciation. What’s the origin for this word? I searched the Urban Dictionary search query on google, and there is a result for the city dictionary. I am not comfortable with using the Urban Dictionary for references on this website.

    There is even only a single opposite word to the word ‘enunciate’, and doesn’t matter. Why are there so many prefixes for everything?

    • 439237 views
    • 419 answers
    • 161661 votes
  • Asked on March 16, 2021 in Grammar.

    If you want to answer a singular question with a plural answer, most people will understand “your friends” as a set of something. I have to do A3 to improve English. I am only learning A3. I am not a native English speaker. I try to learn A2 fluently and I’m tired of A2. This is a hazy situation. A2 is so grossly

    wrong.

    • 887605 views
    • 9 answers
    • 330714 votes
  • Asked on March 16, 2021 in Grammar.

    If you want to answer a singular question with a plural answer, most people will understand “your friends” as a set of something. I have to do A3 to improve English. I am only learning A3. I am not a native English speaker. I try to learn A2 fluently and I’m tired of A2. This is a hazy situation. A2 is so grossly

    wrong.

    • 887605 views
    • 9 answers
    • 330714 votes
  • Asked on March 16, 2021 in Grammar.

    If you want to answer a singular question with a plural answer, most people will understand “your friends” as a set of something. I have to do A3 to improve English. I am only learning A3. I am not a native English speaker. I try to learn A2 fluently and I’m tired of A2. This is a hazy situation. A2 is so grossly

    wrong.

    • 887605 views
    • 9 answers
    • 330714 votes
  • Asked on March 16, 2021 in Grammar.

    If you want to answer a singular question with a plural answer, most people will understand “your friends” as a set of something. I have to do A3 to improve English. I am only learning A3. I am not a native English speaker. I try to learn A2 fluently and I’m tired of A2. This is a hazy situation. A2 is so grossly

    wrong.

    • 887605 views
    • 9 answers
    • 330714 votes
  • Asked on March 16, 2021 in Grammar.

    If you want to answer a singular question with a plural answer, most people will understand “your friends” as a set of something. I have to do A3 to improve English. I am only learning A3. I am not a native English speaker. I try to learn A2 fluently and I’m tired of A2. This is a hazy situation. A2 is so grossly

    wrong.

    • 887605 views
    • 9 answers
    • 330714 votes
  • Asked on March 2, 2021 in Grammar.

    What is s12ng, simple? Original Sentence: Only to the extent of John and Jane are willing to let go of pretense and show themselves for who they are will they be free to enjoy a true marriage and enter honestly into the sacred covenant.

    If I choose to replace verbs with adjectives, I can remove various verbs,

    and modify the structure of this sentence. Only once John and Jane let goes, will they be free to know life gives them pleasure?

    How much more understandable does it become when we simplify it?

    How do I get a quality report?

    • 1198766 views
    • 4 answers
    • 422913 votes