I see other posters who point out that this is a common error of German writing in English, but I have never spoken in native German. I have encountered this error myself. If the “namely”, a term (as defined by the examples) were intended to be used to describe the language, one term would fit well in the context of the example is “i.e.”

Please note this is an abbreviation.

For each of these problems (i.e., are there any variables in the exact system) some algorithms can be used to find the exact solution of the problem. Example: We begin by presenting the natural concern underlying it (i.e., tools), to each player.. On first hand, we start by presenting the gambit.el tools. (by introducing both components). To start with, we try to speak about the purpose and intention of a given game. ), then define the problem (i.e. its intuitive objective). A, tool), and also demonstrate that the problem can be solved (theoretically or practically, the problem solving principle), and finally demonstrate that the problem cannot be solved (i.e. problem solving is not a solution a formula for a problem) (i.e. the, math) , the tool can be constructed.