- James McLeod
- Earth
- Email is hidden.
0
Points
Questions
0
Answers
255
-
If second person is used in English as “to sit,” it is an archaic formal formal past tense of “to
sit” and should not be used in current English.
- 41367 views
- 251 answers
- 15035 votes
-
If second person is used in English as “to sit,” it is an archaic formal formal past tense of “to
sit” and should not be used in current English.
- 41367 views
- 251 answers
- 15035 votes
-
If second person is used in English as “to sit,” it is an archaic formal formal past tense of “to
sit” and should not be used in current English.
- 41367 views
- 251 answers
- 15035 votes
-
If second person is used in English as “to sit,” it is an archaic formal formal past tense of “to
sit” and should not be used in current English.
- 41367 views
- 251 answers
- 15035 votes
-
If second person is used in English as “to sit,” it is an archaic formal formal past tense of “to
sit” and should not be used in current English.
- 41367 views
- 251 answers
- 15035 votes
-
If second person is used in English as “to sit,” it is an archaic formal formal past tense of “to
sit” and should not be used in current English.
- 41367 views
- 251 answers
- 15035 votes
-
If second person is used in English as “to sit,” it is an archaic formal formal past tense of “to
sit” and should not be used in current English.
- 41367 views
- 251 answers
- 15035 votes
-
If second person is used in English as “to sit,” it is an archaic formal formal past tense of “to
sit” and should not be used in current English.
- 41367 views
- 251 answers
- 15035 votes
-
If second person is used in English as “to sit,” it is an archaic formal formal past tense of “to
sit” and should not be used in current English.
- 41367 views
- 251 answers
- 15035 votes
-
If second person is used in English as “to sit,” it is an archaic formal formal past tense of “to
sit” and should not be used in current English.
- 41367 views
- 251 answers
- 15035 votes
