Try Reformed.

Especially if used very carefully, renewed or reborn. Or maybe,

if used very carefully, so again?

Try Reformed.

Especially if used very carefully, renewed or reborn. Or maybe,

if used very carefully, so again?

Try Reformed.

Especially if used very carefully, renewed or reborn. Or maybe,

if used very carefully, so again?

Try Reformed.

Especially if used very carefully, renewed or reborn. Or maybe,

if used very carefully, so again?

Try Reformed.

Especially if used very carefully, renewed or reborn. Or maybe,

if used very carefully, so again?

In the context of paragraphs, the sentence might be clear; but standing alone, the intended interpretation of the sentence is ambiguous.

Grammatically, the reader should look to the immediate antecedent of a pronoun to identify its meaning. They”, rather than’men’, is preceded by ‘they’; absent any other context the reader should conclude that women are fostering the belief that men are in the top job. An author should write so clearly that readers don’t need to pause and deconstruct the grammar of a sentence.

I want to speak up and revise the book. How can women make a man think he is in charge of his own

• affairs?
• How can I make my boyfriend feel like he is in charge?
• Can women let men think that they are in charge?
• Like all women, she had the ability to make men think they are in charge, especially when they use her as their partner.
• Is it true that women are learning to lead while still letting men in and out should men not be involved in anything?

Personally, I think the construction “have the ability” is clunky, direct, and ineffective, so I would use an active expression like the final example above.

.