Yes, options A, B and D are grammatical.

How do I save my time traveling to and from work? The speaker

currently lives somewhere where he is far from work, and so wastes time getting to work habitually.

I have been wasting my money and energy going to work because my friend lived a long distance from me. I still have to get back home. I must remember this one: travel from work to work, no time to work. To leave house if I can easily… In this way

he uses his home somewhere far from his workplace, citing the efficiency of commuting and commuting to the office as evidence of having wasted time.

Because I am living a long way from work, I have been wasting lots of time going to and from work. My job is not a beauty salon, I would rather see someone else than me. I would rather enjoy a good conversation. C: I is a good guy who does good quality business. (present perfect progressive; present perfect progressive)

The speaker stresses that he currently lives far from work, and stresses that he currently wastes lots of time.

If a native speaker could talk to itself and say “I’ve been” I’ve been,” then he’d probably use the verb “I have been” for “I have been” just because it is so long.

What could be a good way to fix OP’s question. You posted this here

and it seems like

it answered OP’s question.

This works fine, however it doesn’t seem to follow the models you provided. Please provide as much information as possible. It uses a relative clause, yes but with a prepositional construct. They don’t appear in neither of the models.