“title” is somewhat graphic – if I can imagine the title written in bold, larger font above the item, it’s a title and if not, it’s a name.

What is so unique about a picture title?

Lastly, speaking of name subjectively – I’d consider its usages a superset of title’s. I am willing to use both and, while getting confused by the latter, I

don’t feel so bad about using both. I can avoid the latter.

“title” is somewhat graphic – if I can imagine the title written in bold, larger font above the item, it’s a title and if not, it’s a name.

What is so unique about a picture title?

Lastly, speaking of name subjectively – I’d consider its usages a superset of title’s. I am willing to use both and, while getting confused by the latter, I

don’t feel so bad about using both. I can avoid the latter.

“title” is somewhat graphic – if I can imagine the title written in bold, larger font above the item, it’s a title and if not, it’s a name.

What is so unique about a picture title?

Lastly, speaking of name subjectively – I’d consider its usages a superset of title’s. I am willing to use both and, while getting confused by the latter, I

don’t feel so bad about using both. I can avoid the latter.

“title” is somewhat graphic – if I can imagine the title written in bold, larger font above the item, it’s a title and if not, it’s a name.

What is so unique about a picture title?

Lastly, speaking of name subjectively – I’d consider its usages a superset of title’s. I am willing to use both and, while getting confused by the latter, I

don’t feel so bad about using both. I can avoid the latter.

“title” is somewhat graphic – if I can imagine the title written in bold, larger font above the item, it’s a title and if not, it’s a name.

What is so unique about a picture title?

Lastly, speaking of name subjectively – I’d consider its usages a superset of title’s. I am willing to use both and, while getting confused by the latter, I

don’t feel so bad about using both. I can avoid the latter.

“title” is somewhat graphic – if I can imagine the title written in bold, larger font above the item, it’s a title and if not, it’s a name.

What is so unique about a picture title?

Lastly, speaking of name subjectively – I’d consider its usages a superset of title’s. I am willing to use both and, while getting confused by the latter, I

don’t feel so bad about using both. I can avoid the latter.

“title” is somewhat graphic – if I can imagine the title written in bold, larger font above the item, it’s a title and if not, it’s a name.

What is so unique about a picture title?

Lastly, speaking of name subjectively – I’d consider its usages a superset of title’s. I am willing to use both and, while getting confused by the latter, I

don’t feel so bad about using both. I can avoid the latter.

“title” is somewhat graphic – if I can imagine the title written in bold, larger font above the item, it’s a title and if not, it’s a name.

What is so unique about a picture title?

Lastly, speaking of name subjectively – I’d consider its usages a superset of title’s. I am willing to use both and, while getting confused by the latter, I

don’t feel so bad about using both. I can avoid the latter.