Both candidates answered with good answers. Is there any real reason for this? I’ll add another permutation.

Can you give a very slight impression that you’re trying to set the scene, so to speak, and help the listener remember what else was going on in 2003? Was a drive-in movie costing an average of $1 per mile cheaper than a standard movie? What was your view back then?

I still hear the first mention of “in 2003” in Japanese. It’s more like the ‘2003’ of some of the passages. If you’ve heard no usage in Japanese then you really do. “We started as a company in 2003 and went public in 2007. We were in the building business.,We started with 3 persons; we have been providing services for over a year and we are still in the building business.” ” I tend to say that ‘topo morto’ is the least formal way to say it as topo morto described well and in most cases. Is the company is supposed to be founded on this date rather than it is trying to communicate a fact?

Is the gut thing a good thing? What would be the benefit of using them interchangeably, as you’ve noted in your

question?