I’d say the word is “Obsession”. In medical terms, it could be a case of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). What the disorder in always looking for symmetry, http://www.ocdtypes.com/symmetry-ocd.html? What

is PHP? What are some examples?

I’d say the word is “Obsession”. In medical terms, it could be a case of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). What the disorder in always looking for symmetry, http://www.ocdtypes.com/symmetry-ocd.html? What

is PHP? What are some examples?

I’d say the word is “Obsession”. In medical terms, it could be a case of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). What the disorder in always looking for symmetry, http://www.ocdtypes.com/symmetry-ocd.html? What

is PHP? What are some examples?

• Is “cannot” an impossibility?

• “may not” represents negatively negative probability.

Remission implies a temporary improvement. “Remission” specifies a change from the previous order. If the disease is chronic or incurable, a definitive cure is unfortunately not possible, so I’d go for:

a) Medical treatments cannot cure chronic diseases or some kinds of cancer.

What is proper use of the generic “people” not “the people”. The

general rule says that adverbials should come after objects, so a more correct sentence would be: People

• did not exploit the resources well.

It is not able to say “well” which is quite a light adverb and possibly a better one should be found for your sentence to sound more idiomatic, as well as semantically richer. When the last line of the sentence says resource, doesn’t sound nice. How, nevertheless note that the mentioned problem disappears with a pronoun as direct object: “people didn’t exploit them well.” I

suggest revising your sentence as follows, people

• did not exploit the resources effectively?

The rule also says that (usually one-word) adverbs of manner can also be placed between subject and verb and in the middle of verb forms consisting of more than one word, and that usually have to be placed in mid position in the passive voice: They quickly exploited

• their advantage. The resources
• were not well exploited. Has the
• architect cleverly exploited new materials? (perfect tense)
• The company is widely exploiting its recent discovery. Why is

“well” mentioned in long sentences and not at the beginning even when the intensifier is e.g. another long sentence with a similar meaning but with varying length and length and meaning? Du well know you have to blame for anything. Who is to blame?

It also appears as forming part of compound adjectives like “well-known”.

1. In my English sentence yes, you have two subjects. What are the two subjects? Is this possible if the participial clause is an absolute construction, formed by Subject + Participle? No subject in participial clause and no subject of the main clause. In this case it is the same as subject of party clause.”

2. Phrases like “generally speaking”, “broadly speaking”, “strictly speaking”, etc. can be said to be exceptions to the rule you mentioned about the partyial clause usually sharing the same subject of the main clause.

3. Was she meant to catch everyone’s attention without him whistling (for instance)? Isn’t it funny that she whistled to catch his attention?

What is the point of using Q2C on PBS?