It’s not necessary to do it like this, when the glottal or vice versa is in the top second but you put it between the two syllabic u’s:

.

It’s not necessary to do it like this, when the glottal or vice versa is in the top second but you put it between the two syllabic u’s:

.

It’s not necessary to do it like this, when the glottal or vice versa is in the top second but you put it between the two syllabic u’s:

.

It’s not necessary to do it like this, when the glottal or vice versa is in the top second but you put it between the two syllabic u’s:

.

It’s not necessary to do it like this, when the glottal or vice versa is in the top second but you put it between the two syllabic u’s:

.

It’s not necessary to do it like this, when the glottal or vice versa is in the top second but you put it between the two syllabic u’s:

.

It’s not necessary to do it like this, when the glottal or vice versa is in the top second but you put it between the two syllabic u’s:

.

It’s not necessary to do it like this, when the glottal or vice versa is in the top second but you put it between the two syllabic u’s:

.

The construction provides a way of shifting responsibility away from a person onto the subject of the “have”. Those who wrote “I was singing along to the recording” (in Hindi) could well’ve easily wrote something that you could have written and sung along. But saying “the recording had me singing along to it” makes the recording responsible. Have you ever been, against your will, simply carried away?

Note that the subject of “have” is often also mentioned later in a sentence, to supply its literal role in the event.

The construction provides a way of shifting responsibility away from a person onto the subject of the “have”. Those who wrote “I was singing along to the recording” (in Hindi) could well’ve easily wrote something that you could have written and sung along. But saying “the recording had me singing along to it” makes the recording responsible. Have you ever been, against your will, simply carried away?

Note that the subject of “have” is often also mentioned later in a sentence, to supply its literal role in the event.