“To be good with (something)” is very colloquial for “to find (something) acceptable or satisfactory”, “to be satisfied with (something)”. I think it’s a fairly recent idiom, and I don’t know how broadly used it is; I’m in the U.S. It’s used correctly in your sentence, as long as such casual language is appropriate for the context. Thanks Aimee for the review!

“He is good with flying to Europe” means essentially that flying to Europe is fine with him.

What would you like a drink, sir? “No, thanks, I’m good.” meaning one is satisfied, has had one’s fill.

“To be good with (something)” is very colloquial for “to find (something) acceptable or satisfactory”, “to be satisfied with (something)”. I think it’s a fairly recent idiom, and I don’t know how broadly used it is; I’m in the U.S. It’s used correctly in your sentence, as long as such casual language is appropriate for the context. Thanks Aimee for the review!

“He is good with flying to Europe” means essentially that flying to Europe is fine with him.

What would you like a drink, sir? “No, thanks, I’m good.” meaning one is satisfied, has had one’s fill.

“To be good with (something)” is very colloquial for “to find (something) acceptable or satisfactory”, “to be satisfied with (something)”. I think it’s a fairly recent idiom, and I don’t know how broadly used it is; I’m in the U.S. It’s used correctly in your sentence, as long as such casual language is appropriate for the context. Thanks Aimee for the review!

“He is good with flying to Europe” means essentially that flying to Europe is fine with him.

What would you like a drink, sir? “No, thanks, I’m good.” meaning one is satisfied, has had one’s fill.

“To be good with (something)” is very colloquial for “to find (something) acceptable or satisfactory”, “to be satisfied with (something)”. I think it’s a fairly recent idiom, and I don’t know how broadly used it is; I’m in the U.S. It’s used correctly in your sentence, as long as such casual language is appropriate for the context. Thanks Aimee for the review!

“He is good with flying to Europe” means essentially that flying to Europe is fine with him.

What would you like a drink, sir? “No, thanks, I’m good.” meaning one is satisfied, has had one’s fill.

“To be good with (something)” is very colloquial for “to find (something) acceptable or satisfactory”, “to be satisfied with (something)”. I think it’s a fairly recent idiom, and I don’t know how broadly used it is; I’m in the U.S. It’s used correctly in your sentence, as long as such casual language is appropriate for the context. Thanks Aimee for the review!

“He is good with flying to Europe” means essentially that flying to Europe is fine with him.

What would you like a drink, sir? “No, thanks, I’m good.” meaning one is satisfied, has had one’s fill.

“To be good with (something)” is very colloquial for “to find (something) acceptable or satisfactory”, “to be satisfied with (something)”. I think it’s a fairly recent idiom, and I don’t know how broadly used it is; I’m in the U.S. It’s used correctly in your sentence, as long as such casual language is appropriate for the context. Thanks Aimee for the review!

“He is good with flying to Europe” means essentially that flying to Europe is fine with him.

What would you like a drink, sir? “No, thanks, I’m good.” meaning one is satisfied, has had one’s fill.

“To be good with (something)” is very colloquial for “to find (something) acceptable or satisfactory”, “to be satisfied with (something)”. I think it’s a fairly recent idiom, and I don’t know how broadly used it is; I’m in the U.S. It’s used correctly in your sentence, as long as such casual language is appropriate for the context. Thanks Aimee for the review!

“He is good with flying to Europe” means essentially that flying to Europe is fine with him.

What would you like a drink, sir? “No, thanks, I’m good.” meaning one is satisfied, has had one’s fill.

Are you thinking the salon? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human Factors? org/wiki/Salon (gathering)

: Original held partly to amuse one another and partly to refine the taste and increase the knowledge of the participants through conversation. In these gatherings, many had consciously followed “either to please or to educate” (Latin: aut delectare aut prodesse ).

What can racial difference to have between jones and straight from the school?

Are you thinking the salon? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human Factors? org/wiki/Salon (gathering)

: Original held partly to amuse one another and partly to refine the taste and increase the knowledge of the participants through conversation. In these gatherings, many had consciously followed “either to please or to educate” (Latin: aut delectare aut prodesse ).

What can racial difference to have between jones and straight from the school?

Are you thinking the salon? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human Factors? org/wiki/Salon (gathering)

: Original held partly to amuse one another and partly to refine the taste and increase the knowledge of the participants through conversation. In these gatherings, many had consciously followed “either to please or to educate” (Latin: aut delectare aut prodesse ).

What can racial difference to have between jones and straight from the school?