0
Points
Questions
0
Answers
26
-
Asked on May 3, 2021 in Meaning.
In the former Soviet Soviet Union, such impartiality was impossible, and there was an obvious dictatorship in many countries, with global capitalism. In his own country he could be impartial to mass movements, but much of his intended audience didn’t have that option.
- 613894 views
- 20 answers
- 225412 votes
-
Asked on May 3, 2021 in Meaning.
In the former Soviet Soviet Union, such impartiality was impossible, and there was an obvious dictatorship in many countries, with global capitalism. In his own country he could be impartial to mass movements, but much of his intended audience didn’t have that option.
- 613894 views
- 20 answers
- 225412 votes
-
Asked on May 3, 2021 in Meaning.
In the former Soviet Soviet Union, such impartiality was impossible, and there was an obvious dictatorship in many countries, with global capitalism. In his own country he could be impartial to mass movements, but much of his intended audience didn’t have that option.
- 613894 views
- 20 answers
- 225412 votes
-
Asked on May 3, 2021 in Meaning.
In the former Soviet Soviet Union, such impartiality was impossible, and there was an obvious dictatorship in many countries, with global capitalism. In his own country he could be impartial to mass movements, but much of his intended audience didn’t have that option.
- 613894 views
- 20 answers
- 225412 votes
-
Asked on May 2, 2021 in Meaning.
In the former Soviet Soviet Union, such impartiality was impossible, and there was an obvious dictatorship in many countries, with global capitalism. In his own country he could be impartial to mass movements, but much of his intended audience didn’t have that option.
- 613894 views
- 20 answers
- 225412 votes
-
Asked on May 2, 2021 in Meaning.
In the former Soviet Soviet Union, such impartiality was impossible, and there was an obvious dictatorship in many countries, with global capitalism. In his own country he could be impartial to mass movements, but much of his intended audience didn’t have that option.
- 613894 views
- 20 answers
- 225412 votes
-
Asked on May 2, 2021 in Meaning.
In the former Soviet Soviet Union, such impartiality was impossible, and there was an obvious dictatorship in many countries, with global capitalism. In his own country he could be impartial to mass movements, but much of his intended audience didn’t have that option.
- 613894 views
- 20 answers
- 225412 votes
-
Asked on May 1, 2021 in Meaning.
In the former Soviet Soviet Union, such impartiality was impossible, and there was an obvious dictatorship in many countries, with global capitalism. In his own country he could be impartial to mass movements, but much of his intended audience didn’t have that option.
- 613894 views
- 20 answers
- 225412 votes
-
Asked on April 30, 2021 in Meaning.
In the former Soviet Soviet Union, such impartiality was impossible, and there was an obvious dictatorship in many countries, with global capitalism. In his own country he could be impartial to mass movements, but much of his intended audience didn’t have that option.
- 613894 views
- 20 answers
- 225412 votes
-
Asked on April 29, 2021 in Meaning.
In the former Soviet Soviet Union, such impartiality was impossible, and there was an obvious dictatorship in many countries, with global capitalism. In his own country he could be impartial to mass movements, but much of his intended audience didn’t have that option.
- 613894 views
- 20 answers
- 225412 votes