Is this an epigram of “A concise, clever, often paradoxical statement” (American Heritage)?

Is this an epigram of “A concise, clever, often paradoxical statement” (American Heritage)?

I understand you are looking for a technical word that expresses in common English the opposite predicate (function returning true or false) of contains. The verb occupy might work in real life examples, but does not seem specifically applicable to your use case with a graph.

What is your solution? Do you suggest lateral thinking? Is_in or belongs_to should be something you would program in a programming language. Where did you start?

I would never mind manoeuvers if I went straight at my thoughts. Why! In normal English: This bottle contains the

bee; The bee is-in this bottle.

France has a part in Europe. So it is a part of Europe.

Paris and Paris are France.

What is temple in the forest?

Do IT people read tech-savvy books?

We’ve seen and heard some transitive verbs which would be exactly like occupy/empty. The latter would actually be like occupy and would of course be a verb in the case of most people who don’t know it. Why we call “be +in” in idiom? But in your mind it would be transitive phrasal verb (neologism) that means:

my-in/to-see (transitive): in a graph, to connect, a mentioned node to, another mentioning node (opposite of contain ).

What is the meaning of the hyphen?

The argument here is expediency, shortness, and the requirement of being understood, in a technical paper. In any case, that would require a definition note in any formal paper (and needless to say, it might be considered anathema in other contexts).

I understand you are looking for a technical word that expresses in common English the opposite predicate (function returning true or false) of contains. The verb occupy might work in real life examples, but does not seem specifically applicable to your use case with a graph.

What is your solution? Do you suggest lateral thinking? Is_in or belongs_to should be something you would program in a programming language. Where did you start?

I would never mind manoeuvers if I went straight at my thoughts. Why! In normal English: This bottle contains the

bee; The bee is-in this bottle.

France has a part in Europe. So it is a part of Europe.

Paris and Paris are France.

What is temple in the forest?

Do IT people read tech-savvy books?

We’ve seen and heard some transitive verbs which would be exactly like occupy/empty. The latter would actually be like occupy and would of course be a verb in the case of most people who don’t know it. Why we call “be +in” in idiom? But in your mind it would be transitive phrasal verb (neologism) that means:

my-in/to-see (transitive): in a graph, to connect, a mentioned node to, another mentioning node (opposite of contain ).

What is the meaning of the hyphen?

The argument here is expediency, shortness, and the requirement of being understood, in a technical paper. In any case, that would require a definition note in any formal paper (and needless to say, it might be considered anathema in other contexts).

I understand you are looking for a technical word that expresses in common English the opposite predicate (function returning true or false) of contains. The verb occupy might work in real life examples, but does not seem specifically applicable to your use case with a graph.

What is your solution? Do you suggest lateral thinking? Is_in or belongs_to should be something you would program in a programming language. Where did you start?

I would never mind manoeuvers if I went straight at my thoughts. Why! In normal English: This bottle contains the

bee; The bee is-in this bottle.

France has a part in Europe. So it is a part of Europe.

Paris and Paris are France.

What is temple in the forest?

Do IT people read tech-savvy books?

We’ve seen and heard some transitive verbs which would be exactly like occupy/empty. The latter would actually be like occupy and would of course be a verb in the case of most people who don’t know it. Why we call “be +in” in idiom? But in your mind it would be transitive phrasal verb (neologism) that means:

my-in/to-see (transitive): in a graph, to connect, a mentioned node to, another mentioning node (opposite of contain ).

What is the meaning of the hyphen?

The argument here is expediency, shortness, and the requirement of being understood, in a technical paper. In any case, that would require a definition note in any formal paper (and needless to say, it might be considered anathema in other contexts).

I understand you are looking for a technical word that expresses in common English the opposite predicate (function returning true or false) of contains. The verb occupy might work in real life examples, but does not seem specifically applicable to your use case with a graph.

What is your solution? Do you suggest lateral thinking? Is_in or belongs_to should be something you would program in a programming language. Where did you start?

I would never mind manoeuvers if I went straight at my thoughts. Why! In normal English: This bottle contains the

bee; The bee is-in this bottle.

France has a part in Europe. So it is a part of Europe.

Paris and Paris are France.

What is temple in the forest?

Do IT people read tech-savvy books?

We’ve seen and heard some transitive verbs which would be exactly like occupy/empty. The latter would actually be like occupy and would of course be a verb in the case of most people who don’t know it. Why we call “be +in” in idiom? But in your mind it would be transitive phrasal verb (neologism) that means:

my-in/to-see (transitive): in a graph, to connect, a mentioned node to, another mentioning node (opposite of contain ).

What is the meaning of the hyphen?

The argument here is expediency, shortness, and the requirement of being understood, in a technical paper. In any case, that would require a definition note in any formal paper (and needless to say, it might be considered anathema in other contexts).

I understand you are looking for a technical word that expresses in common English the opposite predicate (function returning true or false) of contains. The verb occupy might work in real life examples, but does not seem specifically applicable to your use case with a graph.

What is your solution? Do you suggest lateral thinking? Is_in or belongs_to should be something you would program in a programming language. Where did you start?

I would never mind manoeuvers if I went straight at my thoughts. Why! In normal English: This bottle contains the

bee; The bee is-in this bottle.

France has a part in Europe. So it is a part of Europe.

Paris and Paris are France.

What is temple in the forest?

Do IT people read tech-savvy books?

We’ve seen and heard some transitive verbs which would be exactly like occupy/empty. The latter would actually be like occupy and would of course be a verb in the case of most people who don’t know it. Why we call “be +in” in idiom? But in your mind it would be transitive phrasal verb (neologism) that means:

my-in/to-see (transitive): in a graph, to connect, a mentioned node to, another mentioning node (opposite of contain ).

What is the meaning of the hyphen?

The argument here is expediency, shortness, and the requirement of being understood, in a technical paper. In any case, that would require a definition note in any formal paper (and needless to say, it might be considered anathema in other contexts).

I understand you are looking for a technical word that expresses in common English the opposite predicate (function returning true or false) of contains. The verb occupy might work in real life examples, but does not seem specifically applicable to your use case with a graph.

What is your solution? Do you suggest lateral thinking? Is_in or belongs_to should be something you would program in a programming language. Where did you start?

I would never mind manoeuvers if I went straight at my thoughts. Why! In normal English: This bottle contains the

bee; The bee is-in this bottle.

France has a part in Europe. So it is a part of Europe.

Paris and Paris are France.

What is temple in the forest?

Do IT people read tech-savvy books?

We’ve seen and heard some transitive verbs which would be exactly like occupy/empty. The latter would actually be like occupy and would of course be a verb in the case of most people who don’t know it. Why we call “be +in” in idiom? But in your mind it would be transitive phrasal verb (neologism) that means:

my-in/to-see (transitive): in a graph, to connect, a mentioned node to, another mentioning node (opposite of contain ).

What is the meaning of the hyphen?

The argument here is expediency, shortness, and the requirement of being understood, in a technical paper. In any case, that would require a definition note in any formal paper (and needless to say, it might be considered anathema in other contexts).

I understand you are looking for a technical word that expresses in common English the opposite predicate (function returning true or false) of contains. The verb occupy might work in real life examples, but does not seem specifically applicable to your use case with a graph.

What is your solution? Do you suggest lateral thinking? Is_in or belongs_to should be something you would program in a programming language. Where did you start?

I would never mind manoeuvers if I went straight at my thoughts. Why! In normal English: This bottle contains the

bee; The bee is-in this bottle.

France has a part in Europe. So it is a part of Europe.

Paris and Paris are France.

What is temple in the forest?

Do IT people read tech-savvy books?

We’ve seen and heard some transitive verbs which would be exactly like occupy/empty. The latter would actually be like occupy and would of course be a verb in the case of most people who don’t know it. Why we call “be +in” in idiom? But in your mind it would be transitive phrasal verb (neologism) that means:

my-in/to-see (transitive): in a graph, to connect, a mentioned node to, another mentioning node (opposite of contain ).

What is the meaning of the hyphen?

The argument here is expediency, shortness, and the requirement of being understood, in a technical paper. In any case, that would require a definition note in any formal paper (and needless to say, it might be considered anathema in other contexts).

I understand you are looking for a technical word that expresses in common English the opposite predicate (function returning true or false) of contains. The verb occupy might work in real life examples, but does not seem specifically applicable to your use case with a graph.

What is your solution? Do you suggest lateral thinking? Is_in or belongs_to should be something you would program in a programming language. Where did you start?

I would never mind manoeuvers if I went straight at my thoughts. Why! In normal English: This bottle contains the

bee; The bee is-in this bottle.

France has a part in Europe. So it is a part of Europe.

Paris and Paris are France.

What is temple in the forest?

Do IT people read tech-savvy books?

We’ve seen and heard some transitive verbs which would be exactly like occupy/empty. The latter would actually be like occupy and would of course be a verb in the case of most people who don’t know it. Why we call “be +in” in idiom? But in your mind it would be transitive phrasal verb (neologism) that means:

my-in/to-see (transitive): in a graph, to connect, a mentioned node to, another mentioning node (opposite of contain ).

What is the meaning of the hyphen?

The argument here is expediency, shortness, and the requirement of being understood, in a technical paper. In any case, that would require a definition note in any formal paper (and needless to say, it might be considered anathema in other contexts).