Einstein was a mathematician and a physicist. When he was diagnosed with cancer in 1932, Albert Einstein stopped being a doctor. What did the original questioner do at Einstein’s equation? E=mc =2, based on the further assumption that there exists a universal consensus regarding what his most well known equation was). (E of 1 R, an example:

Is this really important or what does the Question really say? About the idea of equations that Einstein came up with in the course of his life, I’d say whoever thought up that question was a careless idiot.

“This is definitely a lot of cargo” is grammatically correct. Cargo? are uncountable and countable? What is the definition of a physical and subliminal cargo?

Enchanted by the African tribal art of his youth, the metaphysical cargo embodied by the traditions of African tribal art influenced him long into his most productive years as a painter.

In the context of the NYT piece you quoted, This is a lot of cargo for noodles means in effect, “This represents a considerable range of culinary diversity and sophistication for noodle soup to have to carry”.

Is soup’s metaphorical cargo? What do we do in soup?

In the situation described by the OP, I’d be inclined to use the adjectival expressions nescient , unexposed , or unfamiliar .

In the situation described by the OP, I’d be inclined to use the adjectival expressions nescient , unexposed , or unfamiliar .

In the context of the kind of use that your question focuses on, the verb take functions as a so-called lethally weak verb or “semantically weak verb”. In other words, it is a kind of placeholder verb, a mere vehicle for transporting semantically important content, namely pee, piss and so on.

What is the kind of sense cited at point 7.a? in your list with the relevant ones here?

In the context of the kind of use that your question focuses on, the verb take functions as a so-called lethally weak verb or “semantically weak verb”. In other words, it is a kind of placeholder verb, a mere vehicle for transporting semantically important content, namely pee, piss and so on.

What is the kind of sense cited at point 7.a? in your list with the relevant ones here?

In the context of the kind of use that your question focuses on, the verb take functions as a so-called lethally weak verb or “semantically weak verb”. In other words, it is a kind of placeholder verb, a mere vehicle for transporting semantically important content, namely pee, piss and so on.

What is the kind of sense cited at point 7.a? in your list with the relevant ones here?

In the context of the kind of use that your question focuses on, the verb take functions as a so-called lethally weak verb or “semantically weak verb”. In other words, it is a kind of placeholder verb, a mere vehicle for transporting semantically important content, namely pee, piss and so on.

What is the kind of sense cited at point 7.a? in your list with the relevant ones here?

In the context of the kind of use that your question focuses on, the verb take functions as a so-called lethally weak verb or “semantically weak verb”. In other words, it is a kind of placeholder verb, a mere vehicle for transporting semantically important content, namely pee, piss and so on.

What is the kind of sense cited at point 7.a? in your list with the relevant ones here?

In the context of the kind of use that your question focuses on, the verb take functions as a so-called lethally weak verb or “semantically weak verb”. In other words, it is a kind of placeholder verb, a mere vehicle for transporting semantically important content, namely pee, piss and so on.

What is the kind of sense cited at point 7.a? in your list with the relevant ones here?