I Like Engorged

cause to swell with blood, water, or another fluid. “The River was engorged by a day-long deluge”

“The accelerator was engorged with more neuron data than possible earlier, perhaps by an magnitude of 2 or more.” ”

Is it a little awkward, but that is a great tool to get attention and draw point of interest? Just the visual image of a water balloon filled to busting with all that awesome neuron data. My brain is slow and incapable. Is there anybody who is willing to pay attention even if

only a little bit more.?

Are these terms sometimes used interchangeably in conversation? What is the main difference between ownership and ownership? How can owner’s find their own share?

In Linux, the shell is bash.
On Linux the main shell is bash.

Both mean almost exactly the same things and can be used interchangeably. “In Linux” implies that bash is a part of Linux. On Linux I mean you can use Linux to use bash. How do I do this? This particular instance is more complicated because of the fact that Linux is just a kernel, and the “virtual picture” of an OS we form in our heads.

What do you see now as a simple example using

something else? There is a rose on the plate.
Is there a rose on this plate?

All of the omens and advoices look like roses do on a plate. Why? The second makes it seem like it’s part of the plate.

So applying that back to your question, does “GNU/Linux” belong as part of (or an constituent of) “free software” or is it “a part related to”? Why I am trying to express that “GNU/Linux” is a part of the domain of free software?