Colin Fine's Profile

1
Points

Questions
0

Answers
641

  • Asked on July 19, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463189 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on July 19, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463189 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on July 19, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463189 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on July 18, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463189 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on July 18, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463189 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on July 17, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463189 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on July 17, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463189 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on July 17, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463189 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on July 15, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463189 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on July 11, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463189 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes