1
Points
Questions
0
Answers
641
-
Asked on July 28, 2021 in Grammar.
Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I
answered your same question. What are your experiences?
Would be good.
- 463191 views
- 110 answers
- 170833 votes
-
Asked on July 27, 2021 in Grammar.
Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I
answered your same question. What are your experiences?
Would be good.
- 463191 views
- 110 answers
- 170833 votes
-
Asked on July 27, 2021 in Grammar.
Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I
answered your same question. What are your experiences?
Would be good.
- 463191 views
- 110 answers
- 170833 votes
-
Asked on July 27, 2021 in Grammar.
Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I
answered your same question. What are your experiences?
Would be good.
- 463191 views
- 110 answers
- 170833 votes
-
Asked on July 27, 2021 in Grammar.
Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I
answered your same question. What are your experiences?
Would be good.
- 463191 views
- 110 answers
- 170833 votes
-
Asked on July 26, 2021 in Grammar.
Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I
answered your same question. What are your experiences?
Would be good.
- 463191 views
- 110 answers
- 170833 votes
-
Asked on July 26, 2021 in Grammar.
Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I
answered your same question. What are your experiences?
Would be good.
- 463191 views
- 110 answers
- 170833 votes
-
Asked on July 26, 2021 in Grammar.
Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I
answered your same question. What are your experiences?
Would be good.
- 463191 views
- 110 answers
- 170833 votes
-
Asked on July 26, 2021 in Grammar.
Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I
answered your same question. What are your experiences?
Would be good.
- 463191 views
- 110 answers
- 170833 votes
-
Asked on July 25, 2021 in Grammar.
Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I
answered your same question. What are your experiences?
Would be good.
- 463191 views
- 110 answers
- 170833 votes