Colin Fine's Profile

1
Points

Questions
0

Answers
641

  • Asked on August 11, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463193 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on August 11, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463193 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on August 11, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463193 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on August 11, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463193 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on August 10, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463193 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on August 10, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463193 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on August 10, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463193 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on August 10, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463193 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on August 10, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463193 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes
  • Asked on August 9, 2021 in Grammar.

    Both are good. The first is great. The second is nothing. The third one (see notes) doesn’t work because there is no have in the main sentence, so the tenses don’t match up, which sounds odd. I

    answered your same question. What are your experiences?

    Would be good.

    • 463193 views
    • 110 answers
    • 170833 votes