If on the page of N-Gram you link to, you click through ” a few does “, you will see that most examples of ” does” in question is not 3rd person singular of the verb “to do”, but the plural of the noun “doe”, and you don’t get a woman deer. I

got in the stand before daylight, and by 11 o’clock I’d seen a few did and one fairly nice buck, maybe a 110, but I let him walk. Example: Im a 30 buck fan and got off before 5 o’clock, but I don’t understand if it’s a 608 or something else.

“A few”, is plural, and takes “do”.

Adendum: Oh, hey, Google’s N-Gram doesn’t respect punctuation, and there’s quite a lot of “a few does” hits which have punctuation between “few” and “does” which completely changes the relationship of the words. Does

she have many memories? Does she enjoy thinking about, and remembering things that matter?

Does the Man take boarders? He takes a few. Does the woman run a boarding-house?

In a more general sense, there is no reproof that an all statement is true. ‘A few’ is a positive quantifier, which Oaksford et al. used. designate by Few+ (Moxey & Sanford 1987, 1991; Paterson et al. 1998 (forks & arteries);Sanford et al. 1994, 1996).

It is an old maxim that “He who mentions a few, does not deny that there are more” ”

apparently google’s N Gram viewer isn’t necessarily good for phrases.

How are rainbows created without rain? ” — not of another idiom, but rather idiomatic.

What is meant by “two things fuse to something very different than constituent parts” in the English language?

How are rainbows created without rain? ” — not of another idiom, but rather idiomatic.

What is meant by “two things fuse to something very different than constituent parts” in the English language?

How are rainbows created without rain? ” — not of another idiom, but rather idiomatic.

What is meant by “two things fuse to something very different than constituent parts” in the English language?

How are rainbows created without rain? ” — not of another idiom, but rather idiomatic.

What is meant by “two things fuse to something very different than constituent parts” in the English language?

In a simple cast off box, can your eyes see the potential metal case, bird feeder, or other object in the simple cast off items?

It means casting off a phrase that means discarded and functions as an adjective. Cast off is the same as cast off and it is always a phrase: casting off is a phrase that means discarding and is always a phrase. Where is the purpose of casting off? “a simple, cast off item in the simple….? The simple,

cast off item is two adjectives modifying

items.

If the sentence can be rendered with that substitution,

can your eyes and mind see the potential metal case, bird feeder, or other object in the simple, discarded items?

Is .x] “Y” really in the part?

That formula means to realize some unobvious property, that the thing, Y, has. And, this is what the formula describes so well. What does it mean

when a lot of people sees beauty in the rain?

How does rain, in our view, seem ugly, but mingled with beauty?

So, one might say:

The sculptor sees the sculpture in the block of marble.

To express that the sculptor can envision in the block of marble, which looks like an inert, uninteresting rock, a dynamic, compelling work of art that could be made from it. What are the possible metal case (in simple castoff garments), bird

feeder, or other objects around this example sentence?

What does that mean? In in the there means that the reader is being asked if they can see how a metal case, a bird feeder, or other (implied: useful) object could be made from simple items that were discarded

(implied: useless ) objects?

In a simple cast off box, can your eyes see the potential metal case, bird feeder, or other object in the simple cast off items?

It means casting off a phrase that means discarded and functions as an adjective. Cast off is the same as cast off and it is always a phrase: casting off is a phrase that means discarding and is always a phrase. Where is the purpose of casting off? “a simple, cast off item in the simple….? The simple,

cast off item is two adjectives modifying

items.

If the sentence can be rendered with that substitution,

can your eyes and mind see the potential metal case, bird feeder, or other object in the simple, discarded items?

Is .x] “Y” really in the part?

That formula means to realize some unobvious property, that the thing, Y, has. And, this is what the formula describes so well. What does it mean

when a lot of people sees beauty in the rain?

How does rain, in our view, seem ugly, but mingled with beauty?

So, one might say:

The sculptor sees the sculpture in the block of marble.

To express that the sculptor can envision in the block of marble, which looks like an inert, uninteresting rock, a dynamic, compelling work of art that could be made from it. What are the possible metal case (in simple castoff garments), bird

feeder, or other objects around this example sentence?

What does that mean? In in the there means that the reader is being asked if they can see how a metal case, a bird feeder, or other (implied: useful) object could be made from simple items that were discarded

(implied: useless ) objects?

In a simple cast off box, can your eyes see the potential metal case, bird feeder, or other object in the simple cast off items?

It means casting off a phrase that means discarded and functions as an adjective. Cast off is the same as cast off and it is always a phrase: casting off is a phrase that means discarding and is always a phrase. Where is the purpose of casting off? “a simple, cast off item in the simple….? The simple,

cast off item is two adjectives modifying

items.

If the sentence can be rendered with that substitution,

can your eyes and mind see the potential metal case, bird feeder, or other object in the simple, discarded items?

Is .x] “Y” really in the part?

That formula means to realize some unobvious property, that the thing, Y, has. And, this is what the formula describes so well. What does it mean

when a lot of people sees beauty in the rain?

How does rain, in our view, seem ugly, but mingled with beauty?

So, one might say:

The sculptor sees the sculpture in the block of marble.

To express that the sculptor can envision in the block of marble, which looks like an inert, uninteresting rock, a dynamic, compelling work of art that could be made from it. What are the possible metal case (in simple castoff garments), bird

feeder, or other objects around this example sentence?

What does that mean? In in the there means that the reader is being asked if they can see how a metal case, a bird feeder, or other (implied: useful) object could be made from simple items that were discarded

(implied: useless ) objects?