In this context, to denote means to indicate or to convey a meaning. A new term does not convey meaning directly. If it is direct there is no need to convey a meaning by contacting a different term. You bestow the meaning of the new term. You name and design it. You design, you name it. “The XYZ attack” is the third reported attack. I designate the third reported attack as an attempt to “define the third reported attack” the xyz attack. In

addition, to use a restrictive clause (one beginning with “that”) implies that there were multiple third reported attacks but that you describe only one as the “xyz” attack. What is a non-strictive clause: using the words which (? and the rest of the clauses) begin with which/ which/which is enclosed above and end with “which”?

Besides, it’s not clear why the present tense would be used with a single reported attack in the past. Is it possible that one of the following fits the intended meaning? What type of attack occurred?

The third reported attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurred when (an elderly man was beaten near City Hall)…

The third type of attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurs when (the enemy gains the element of surprise)…

Edit: with clarification that the attack type is a computer attack, the following wording would be appropriate: We call

(or name or designate) the third type of reported attack a rollback attack.

The third type of reported attack, termed (or called or designated ) as a rollback attack,…

“Rollback attack” denotes (or describes or refers to) the third type of reported attack.

In terms of three types of reported attacks (not just backscrying and escaping) we call on rollback (or

the call to name or design) it a rollback (… the phrase “type of reported attack” is used in all cases because only one or several attacks were presumably reported but you wish to describe all such attacks). The article “A” sounds more natural because you’re referring to a general rollback attack. If you discuss a specific rollback attack, you would use the article “the”: Consider

a rollback attack, this type of attack affects components Y and Z. The attack can be blocked by…

In this context, to denote means to indicate or to convey a meaning. A new term does not convey meaning directly. If it is direct there is no need to convey a meaning by contacting a different term. You bestow the meaning of the new term. You name and design it. You design, you name it. “The XYZ attack” is the third reported attack. I designate the third reported attack as an attempt to “define the third reported attack” the xyz attack. In

addition, to use a restrictive clause (one beginning with “that”) implies that there were multiple third reported attacks but that you describe only one as the “xyz” attack. What is a non-strictive clause: using the words which (? and the rest of the clauses) begin with which/ which/which is enclosed above and end with “which”?

Besides, it’s not clear why the present tense would be used with a single reported attack in the past. Is it possible that one of the following fits the intended meaning? What type of attack occurred?

The third reported attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurred when (an elderly man was beaten near City Hall)…

The third type of attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurs when (the enemy gains the element of surprise)…

Edit: with clarification that the attack type is a computer attack, the following wording would be appropriate: We call

(or name or designate) the third type of reported attack a rollback attack.

The third type of reported attack, termed (or called or designated ) as a rollback attack,…

“Rollback attack” denotes (or describes or refers to) the third type of reported attack.

In terms of three types of reported attacks (not just backscrying and escaping) we call on rollback (or

the call to name or design) it a rollback (… the phrase “type of reported attack” is used in all cases because only one or several attacks were presumably reported but you wish to describe all such attacks). The article “A” sounds more natural because you’re referring to a general rollback attack. If you discuss a specific rollback attack, you would use the article “the”: Consider

a rollback attack, this type of attack affects components Y and Z. The attack can be blocked by…

In this context, to denote means to indicate or to convey a meaning. A new term does not convey meaning directly. If it is direct there is no need to convey a meaning by contacting a different term. You bestow the meaning of the new term. You name and design it. You design, you name it. “The XYZ attack” is the third reported attack. I designate the third reported attack as an attempt to “define the third reported attack” the xyz attack. In

addition, to use a restrictive clause (one beginning with “that”) implies that there were multiple third reported attacks but that you describe only one as the “xyz” attack. What is a non-strictive clause: using the words which (? and the rest of the clauses) begin with which/ which/which is enclosed above and end with “which”?

Besides, it’s not clear why the present tense would be used with a single reported attack in the past. Is it possible that one of the following fits the intended meaning? What type of attack occurred?

The third reported attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurred when (an elderly man was beaten near City Hall)…

The third type of attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurs when (the enemy gains the element of surprise)…

Edit: with clarification that the attack type is a computer attack, the following wording would be appropriate: We call

(or name or designate) the third type of reported attack a rollback attack.

The third type of reported attack, termed (or called or designated ) as a rollback attack,…

“Rollback attack” denotes (or describes or refers to) the third type of reported attack.

In terms of three types of reported attacks (not just backscrying and escaping) we call on rollback (or

the call to name or design) it a rollback (… the phrase “type of reported attack” is used in all cases because only one or several attacks were presumably reported but you wish to describe all such attacks). The article “A” sounds more natural because you’re referring to a general rollback attack. If you discuss a specific rollback attack, you would use the article “the”: Consider

a rollback attack, this type of attack affects components Y and Z. The attack can be blocked by…

In this context, to denote means to indicate or to convey a meaning. A new term does not convey meaning directly. If it is direct there is no need to convey a meaning by contacting a different term. You bestow the meaning of the new term. You name and design it. You design, you name it. “The XYZ attack” is the third reported attack. I designate the third reported attack as an attempt to “define the third reported attack” the xyz attack. In

addition, to use a restrictive clause (one beginning with “that”) implies that there were multiple third reported attacks but that you describe only one as the “xyz” attack. What is a non-strictive clause: using the words which (? and the rest of the clauses) begin with which/ which/which is enclosed above and end with “which”?

Besides, it’s not clear why the present tense would be used with a single reported attack in the past. Is it possible that one of the following fits the intended meaning? What type of attack occurred?

The third reported attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurred when (an elderly man was beaten near City Hall)…

The third type of attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurs when (the enemy gains the element of surprise)…

Edit: with clarification that the attack type is a computer attack, the following wording would be appropriate: We call

(or name or designate) the third type of reported attack a rollback attack.

The third type of reported attack, termed (or called or designated ) as a rollback attack,…

“Rollback attack” denotes (or describes or refers to) the third type of reported attack.

In terms of three types of reported attacks (not just backscrying and escaping) we call on rollback (or

the call to name or design) it a rollback (… the phrase “type of reported attack” is used in all cases because only one or several attacks were presumably reported but you wish to describe all such attacks). The article “A” sounds more natural because you’re referring to a general rollback attack. If you discuss a specific rollback attack, you would use the article “the”: Consider

a rollback attack, this type of attack affects components Y and Z. The attack can be blocked by…

In this context, to denote means to indicate or to convey a meaning. A new term does not convey meaning directly. If it is direct there is no need to convey a meaning by contacting a different term. You bestow the meaning of the new term. You name and design it. You design, you name it. “The XYZ attack” is the third reported attack. I designate the third reported attack as an attempt to “define the third reported attack” the xyz attack. In

addition, to use a restrictive clause (one beginning with “that”) implies that there were multiple third reported attacks but that you describe only one as the “xyz” attack. What is a non-strictive clause: using the words which (? and the rest of the clauses) begin with which/ which/which is enclosed above and end with “which”?

Besides, it’s not clear why the present tense would be used with a single reported attack in the past. Is it possible that one of the following fits the intended meaning? What type of attack occurred?

The third reported attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurred when (an elderly man was beaten near City Hall)…

The third type of attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurs when (the enemy gains the element of surprise)…

Edit: with clarification that the attack type is a computer attack, the following wording would be appropriate: We call

(or name or designate) the third type of reported attack a rollback attack.

The third type of reported attack, termed (or called or designated ) as a rollback attack,…

“Rollback attack” denotes (or describes or refers to) the third type of reported attack.

In terms of three types of reported attacks (not just backscrying and escaping) we call on rollback (or

the call to name or design) it a rollback (… the phrase “type of reported attack” is used in all cases because only one or several attacks were presumably reported but you wish to describe all such attacks). The article “A” sounds more natural because you’re referring to a general rollback attack. If you discuss a specific rollback attack, you would use the article “the”: Consider

a rollback attack, this type of attack affects components Y and Z. The attack can be blocked by…

In this context, to denote means to indicate or to convey a meaning. A new term does not convey meaning directly. If it is direct there is no need to convey a meaning by contacting a different term. You bestow the meaning of the new term. You name and design it. You design, you name it. “The XYZ attack” is the third reported attack. I designate the third reported attack as an attempt to “define the third reported attack” the xyz attack. In

addition, to use a restrictive clause (one beginning with “that”) implies that there were multiple third reported attacks but that you describe only one as the “xyz” attack. What is a non-strictive clause: using the words which (? and the rest of the clauses) begin with which/ which/which is enclosed above and end with “which”?

Besides, it’s not clear why the present tense would be used with a single reported attack in the past. Is it possible that one of the following fits the intended meaning? What type of attack occurred?

The third reported attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurred when (an elderly man was beaten near City Hall)…

The third type of attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurs when (the enemy gains the element of surprise)…

Edit: with clarification that the attack type is a computer attack, the following wording would be appropriate: We call

(or name or designate) the third type of reported attack a rollback attack.

The third type of reported attack, termed (or called or designated ) as a rollback attack,…

“Rollback attack” denotes (or describes or refers to) the third type of reported attack.

In terms of three types of reported attacks (not just backscrying and escaping) we call on rollback (or

the call to name or design) it a rollback (… the phrase “type of reported attack” is used in all cases because only one or several attacks were presumably reported but you wish to describe all such attacks). The article “A” sounds more natural because you’re referring to a general rollback attack. If you discuss a specific rollback attack, you would use the article “the”: Consider

a rollback attack, this type of attack affects components Y and Z. The attack can be blocked by…

In this context, to denote means to indicate or to convey a meaning. A new term does not convey meaning directly. If it is direct there is no need to convey a meaning by contacting a different term. You bestow the meaning of the new term. You name and design it. You design, you name it. “The XYZ attack” is the third reported attack. I designate the third reported attack as an attempt to “define the third reported attack” the xyz attack. In

addition, to use a restrictive clause (one beginning with “that”) implies that there were multiple third reported attacks but that you describe only one as the “xyz” attack. What is a non-strictive clause: using the words which (? and the rest of the clauses) begin with which/ which/which is enclosed above and end with “which”?

Besides, it’s not clear why the present tense would be used with a single reported attack in the past. Is it possible that one of the following fits the intended meaning? What type of attack occurred?

The third reported attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurred when (an elderly man was beaten near City Hall)…

The third type of attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurs when (the enemy gains the element of surprise)…

Edit: with clarification that the attack type is a computer attack, the following wording would be appropriate: We call

(or name or designate) the third type of reported attack a rollback attack.

The third type of reported attack, termed (or called or designated ) as a rollback attack,…

“Rollback attack” denotes (or describes or refers to) the third type of reported attack.

In terms of three types of reported attacks (not just backscrying and escaping) we call on rollback (or

the call to name or design) it a rollback (… the phrase “type of reported attack” is used in all cases because only one or several attacks were presumably reported but you wish to describe all such attacks). The article “A” sounds more natural because you’re referring to a general rollback attack. If you discuss a specific rollback attack, you would use the article “the”: Consider

a rollback attack, this type of attack affects components Y and Z. The attack can be blocked by…

In this context, to denote means to indicate or to convey a meaning. A new term does not convey meaning directly. If it is direct there is no need to convey a meaning by contacting a different term. You bestow the meaning of the new term. You name and design it. You design, you name it. “The XYZ attack” is the third reported attack. I designate the third reported attack as an attempt to “define the third reported attack” the xyz attack. In

addition, to use a restrictive clause (one beginning with “that”) implies that there were multiple third reported attacks but that you describe only one as the “xyz” attack. What is a non-strictive clause: using the words which (? and the rest of the clauses) begin with which/ which/which is enclosed above and end with “which”?

Besides, it’s not clear why the present tense would be used with a single reported attack in the past. Is it possible that one of the following fits the intended meaning? What type of attack occurred?

The third reported attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurred when (an elderly man was beaten near City Hall)…

The third type of attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurs when (the enemy gains the element of surprise)…

Edit: with clarification that the attack type is a computer attack, the following wording would be appropriate: We call

(or name or designate) the third type of reported attack a rollback attack.

The third type of reported attack, termed (or called or designated ) as a rollback attack,…

“Rollback attack” denotes (or describes or refers to) the third type of reported attack.

In terms of three types of reported attacks (not just backscrying and escaping) we call on rollback (or

the call to name or design) it a rollback (… the phrase “type of reported attack” is used in all cases because only one or several attacks were presumably reported but you wish to describe all such attacks). The article “A” sounds more natural because you’re referring to a general rollback attack. If you discuss a specific rollback attack, you would use the article “the”: Consider

a rollback attack, this type of attack affects components Y and Z. The attack can be blocked by…

In this context, to denote means to indicate or to convey a meaning. A new term does not convey meaning directly. If it is direct there is no need to convey a meaning by contacting a different term. You bestow the meaning of the new term. You name and design it. You design, you name it. “The XYZ attack” is the third reported attack. I designate the third reported attack as an attempt to “define the third reported attack” the xyz attack. In

addition, to use a restrictive clause (one beginning with “that”) implies that there were multiple third reported attacks but that you describe only one as the “xyz” attack. What is a non-strictive clause: using the words which (? and the rest of the clauses) begin with which/ which/which is enclosed above and end with “which”?

Besides, it’s not clear why the present tense would be used with a single reported attack in the past. Is it possible that one of the following fits the intended meaning? What type of attack occurred?

The third reported attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurred when (an elderly man was beaten near City Hall)…

The third type of attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurs when (the enemy gains the element of surprise)…

Edit: with clarification that the attack type is a computer attack, the following wording would be appropriate: We call

(or name or designate) the third type of reported attack a rollback attack.

The third type of reported attack, termed (or called or designated ) as a rollback attack,…

“Rollback attack” denotes (or describes or refers to) the third type of reported attack.

In terms of three types of reported attacks (not just backscrying and escaping) we call on rollback (or

the call to name or design) it a rollback (… the phrase “type of reported attack” is used in all cases because only one or several attacks were presumably reported but you wish to describe all such attacks). The article “A” sounds more natural because you’re referring to a general rollback attack. If you discuss a specific rollback attack, you would use the article “the”: Consider

a rollback attack, this type of attack affects components Y and Z. The attack can be blocked by…

In this context, to denote means to indicate or to convey a meaning. A new term does not convey meaning directly. If it is direct there is no need to convey a meaning by contacting a different term. You bestow the meaning of the new term. You name and design it. You design, you name it. “The XYZ attack” is the third reported attack. I designate the third reported attack as an attempt to “define the third reported attack” the xyz attack. In

addition, to use a restrictive clause (one beginning with “that”) implies that there were multiple third reported attacks but that you describe only one as the “xyz” attack. What is a non-strictive clause: using the words which (? and the rest of the clauses) begin with which/ which/which is enclosed above and end with “which”?

Besides, it’s not clear why the present tense would be used with a single reported attack in the past. Is it possible that one of the following fits the intended meaning? What type of attack occurred?

The third reported attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurred when (an elderly man was beaten near City Hall)…

The third type of attack, which we designate the “xyz” attack, occurs when (the enemy gains the element of surprise)…

Edit: with clarification that the attack type is a computer attack, the following wording would be appropriate: We call

(or name or designate) the third type of reported attack a rollback attack.

The third type of reported attack, termed (or called or designated ) as a rollback attack,…

“Rollback attack” denotes (or describes or refers to) the third type of reported attack.

In terms of three types of reported attacks (not just backscrying and escaping) we call on rollback (or

the call to name or design) it a rollback (… the phrase “type of reported attack” is used in all cases because only one or several attacks were presumably reported but you wish to describe all such attacks). The article “A” sounds more natural because you’re referring to a general rollback attack. If you discuss a specific rollback attack, you would use the article “the”: Consider

a rollback attack, this type of attack affects components Y and Z. The attack can be blocked by…