chasly from UK's Profile

1
Points

Questions
0

Answers
557

  • Asked on March 26, 2021 in Grammar.

    The word “so” can have many meanings. In the headline I would interpret it as meaning, “in such a way that”.

    However the headline and indeed the article appear not to have been written by a native English speaker.

    How many times a headline gets the design changed? What is the final sentence in this article worth?

    • 624732 views
    • 1 answers
    • 231210 votes
  • Asked on March 25, 2021 in Grammar.

    What is the opposition between good and evil? What

    is the normal way of saying it ?

    What is the opposite between good and evil? Is

    the above grammatically grammatically possible but no one will ever say it to me.

    What is the difference between good and evil?

    That sounds overdramatic as though you are making a speech.

    Does the opposition between good and evil still exist?

    • 777917 views
    • 2 answers
    • 287908 votes
  • Asked on March 23, 2021 in Grammar.

    You say,

    I think the grammar of “malware contained” is similar to sugar free.

    You are wrong.

    1. A “malware-contained” is like a “sugar-freed”.

    2. How do I to invert (sugar

    freed) from —> sugar and (malware

    contained) from —> sugar. Ronald noted

    that (Really) you can and can just say “I want to make sure it is malware-free. I’m allergic to Sugar” and you can’t change it for whatever reason. ”

    I am not in the habit of having my own “place” all the time. I don’t like them. Was it just me?

    • 789890 views
    • 21 answers
    • 293495 votes
  • Asked on March 22, 2021 in Grammar.

    You say,

    I think the grammar of “malware contained” is similar to sugar free.

    You are wrong.

    1. A “malware-contained” is like a “sugar-freed”.

    2. How do I to invert (sugar

    freed) from —> sugar and (malware

    contained) from —> sugar. Ronald noted

    that (Really) you can and can just say “I want to make sure it is malware-free. I’m allergic to Sugar” and you can’t change it for whatever reason. ”

    I am not in the habit of having my own “place” all the time. I don’t like them. Was it just me?

    • 789890 views
    • 21 answers
    • 293495 votes
  • jungly

    jungle-like

    Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then

    arboraceous

    arborial

    Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then arboraceous arborial Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then forestry for arborial purposes is the term arborial. They have no physical branches and in some ways are very unusable. They are even more annoying, when you make the references at this point in time.

    • 802931 views
    • 38 answers
    • 299092 votes
  • jungly

    jungle-like

    Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then

    arboraceous

    arborial

    Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then arboraceous arborial Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then forestry for arborial purposes is the term arborial. They have no physical branches and in some ways are very unusable. They are even more annoying, when you make the references at this point in time.

    • 802931 views
    • 38 answers
    • 299092 votes
  • jungly

    jungle-like

    Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then

    arboraceous

    arborial

    Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then arboraceous arborial Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then forestry for arborial purposes is the term arborial. They have no physical branches and in some ways are very unusable. They are even more annoying, when you make the references at this point in time.

    • 802931 views
    • 38 answers
    • 299092 votes
  • jungly

    jungle-like

    Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then

    arboraceous

    arborial

    Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then arboraceous arborial Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then forestry for arborial purposes is the term arborial. They have no physical branches and in some ways are very unusable. They are even more annoying, when you make the references at this point in time.

    • 802931 views
    • 38 answers
    • 299092 votes
  • jungly

    jungle-like

    Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then

    arboraceous

    arborial

    Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then arboraceous arborial Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then forestry for arborial purposes is the term arborial. They have no physical branches and in some ways are very unusable. They are even more annoying, when you make the references at this point in time.

    • 802931 views
    • 38 answers
    • 299092 votes
  • jungly

    jungle-like

    Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then

    arboraceous

    arborial

    Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then arboraceous arborial Or if you specifically want to refer to trees then forestry for arborial purposes is the term arborial. They have no physical branches and in some ways are very unusable. They are even more annoying, when you make the references at this point in time.

    • 802931 views
    • 38 answers
    • 299092 votes