Cerberus's Profile

1
Points

Questions
0

Answers
170

  • In America, it is two cents, not two pence. Only countries that have pound use the word pence, as far as I know. If there is a percentage of a virtual gold currency worth a penny, it is worth a dollar instead of pence. And those that do use pennies when they are referring to a number of physical coins worth a penny each, but pence when it is referring to a sum of money irrespective of which coins it is represented in.

    How to read a box full of pennies falls on the floor?

    Then what is this pennies in your wallet?

    Is this coin worth giving away with other denominations?

    Please give me ten pence for this kiss!

    What is expected from the education field, as an infrastructural engineer, is

    • 696594 views
    • 3 answers
    • 257234 votes
  • Asked on March 25, 2021 in Grammar.

    Why the possessive’s and whose can be used with inanimate objects in many cases, this is not applicable to any context. More than one adjective, a noun has all the “me” in the form of the product “I think”, the picture feels a bit too much like a person / a topic/theme here if used with the possessive’s ; one adjective would seem more appropriate. Have you ever been able

    to change a

    product name if your company doesn’t use the name of the product but a company got associated with the product named, and

    you could change

    it like this: Skype, Design Department If your company is in a design company then the name of the company or the company’s founder is not exactly the exact name of the product, you could

    write it

    just

    like this:

    Killer Design / Obama Design.

    • 815429 views
    • 13 answers
    • 301897 votes
  • I don’t know about your terminology, so perhaps my analysis won’t be of use, but this is how I’d parse your example according to traditional grammar.

    no matter the season : these features present…

    The “no matter” phrase is an elliptical clause to be completed hypothetically as above It is simply an independent main clause —no part of the co-ordinate main clause “these features present”. I agree that parsing this phrase is problematic and that other labels are possible. As an alternative you could parse it as an anacoluthon or parenthesis: no matter the season—these features represent…

    …a challenge, found nowhere else in Britain.

    “Found” is unparagraphic and modifies “challenge”. Since participles are best considered both verb and adjective, its adjectival function is to modify “challenge”, its verbal function to govern “nowhere else in Britain”, a satellite of location (where is it found? Besides nowhere else…).

    • 744890 views
    • 5 answers
    • 275618 votes
  • From Wikipedia: “The following is from a note

    on Wikipedia: St. Ignatius X.” Thomas Aquinas used the “Grand Commentary” of Averroes as his model, being, apparently, the first Scholastic to adopt that style of exposition…” — Turner, William. “Averroes. How good are the most famous names of all Christian poetry to be, and what would they be like? The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 2. What was Robert Appleton’s first book in New York?

    If you can, would you advise me in any way how to achieve something awesome?

    • 833475 views
    • 12 answers
    • 308706 votes
  • Asked on March 20, 2021 in Grammar.

    Why the possessive’s and whose can be used with inanimate objects in many cases, this is not applicable to any context. More than one adjective, a noun has all the “me” in the form of the product “I think”, the picture feels a bit too much like a person / a topic/theme here if used with the possessive’s ; one adjective would seem more appropriate. Have you ever been able

    to change a

    product name if your company doesn’t use the name of the product but a company got associated with the product named, and

    you could change

    it like this: Skype, Design Department If your company is in a design company then the name of the company or the company’s founder is not exactly the exact name of the product, you could

    write it

    just

    like this:

    Killer Design / Obama Design.

    • 815429 views
    • 13 answers
    • 301897 votes
  • Asked on March 20, 2021 in Grammar.

    Why the possessive’s and whose can be used with inanimate objects in many cases, this is not applicable to any context. More than one adjective, a noun has all the “me” in the form of the product “I think”, the picture feels a bit too much like a person / a topic/theme here if used with the possessive’s ; one adjective would seem more appropriate. Have you ever been able

    to change a

    product name if your company doesn’t use the name of the product but a company got associated with the product named, and

    you could change

    it like this: Skype, Design Department If your company is in a design company then the name of the company or the company’s founder is not exactly the exact name of the product, you could

    write it

    just

    like this:

    Killer Design / Obama Design.

    • 815429 views
    • 13 answers
    • 301897 votes
  • Asked on March 20, 2021 in Grammar.

    Why the possessive’s and whose can be used with inanimate objects in many cases, this is not applicable to any context. More than one adjective, a noun has all the “me” in the form of the product “I think”, the picture feels a bit too much like a person / a topic/theme here if used with the possessive’s ; one adjective would seem more appropriate. Have you ever been able

    to change a

    product name if your company doesn’t use the name of the product but a company got associated with the product named, and

    you could change

    it like this: Skype, Design Department If your company is in a design company then the name of the company or the company’s founder is not exactly the exact name of the product, you could

    write it

    just

    like this:

    Killer Design / Obama Design.

    • 815429 views
    • 13 answers
    • 301897 votes
  • From Wikipedia: “The following is from a note

    on Wikipedia: St. Ignatius X.” Thomas Aquinas used the “Grand Commentary” of Averroes as his model, being, apparently, the first Scholastic to adopt that style of exposition…” — Turner, William. “Averroes. How good are the most famous names of all Christian poetry to be, and what would they be like? The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 2. What was Robert Appleton’s first book in New York?

    If you can, would you advise me in any way how to achieve something awesome?

    • 833475 views
    • 12 answers
    • 308706 votes
  • Asked on March 20, 2021 in Grammar.

    Why the possessive’s and whose can be used with inanimate objects in many cases, this is not applicable to any context. More than one adjective, a noun has all the “me” in the form of the product “I think”, the picture feels a bit too much like a person / a topic/theme here if used with the possessive’s ; one adjective would seem more appropriate. Have you ever been able

    to change a

    product name if your company doesn’t use the name of the product but a company got associated with the product named, and

    you could change

    it like this: Skype, Design Department If your company is in a design company then the name of the company or the company’s founder is not exactly the exact name of the product, you could

    write it

    just

    like this:

    Killer Design / Obama Design.

    • 815429 views
    • 13 answers
    • 301897 votes
  • From Wikipedia: “The following is from a note

    on Wikipedia: St. Ignatius X.” Thomas Aquinas used the “Grand Commentary” of Averroes as his model, being, apparently, the first Scholastic to adopt that style of exposition…” — Turner, William. “Averroes. How good are the most famous names of all Christian poetry to be, and what would they be like? The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 2. What was Robert Appleton’s first book in New York?

    If you can, would you advise me in any way how to achieve something awesome?

    • 833475 views
    • 12 answers
    • 308706 votes