In hindsight, even if you’re trolling for good, you know you’re being a pain in the ass to someone. I’m on the fence with OP. Previously: If a

Troll provides counter-arguments, it thusly negates (something). I know one troll, I’ve argued with the same thing. “I am on fence in this”. Synonyms of negate include nullify, neutralize, etc. Do you think being against a viewpoint is negative? Are you sure that it is? Propositional Logic uses the term argument to describe the basic structure of any dispute. In a dispute there are contradicting ideas: arguments. Upon resolution of a dispute, ideally one (set of) argument(s) appeals to logic. Which arguments learn?

Why is “one man’s hero always a tyrant”?

If a troll disrupts interaction they perceive to be prejudiced, bullying, corporate bullying, imperialism, etc., a troll is another person who trolls more of the interaction. — your dichotomous assessment of the action would be dictated by your agency in said matters. When the court says the verdict will be decided:

So trolling can be positive.