Wikipedia attests a specific term for your relationship if two parties are coparents-in-law. We recommend simply putting in-law in conversation: Rare

in conversation, the generic “in-laws” is generally used. Once grandchildren are born, the term co-grandparents may be used if the focus is on the relationship through the grandchildren rather than through the married couple.

While we most often use in-law (which refers to the blood relatives of your own spouse) or sometimes the spouses of your blood relatives, you can also use it for other relatives by marriage. To your spouse, brother-in-law (brother inlaws), spouse, in-law, etc., but an in-law is a family member, but in a more distant context.

If that’s unsatisfactory, please just call my daughter’s in-laws or my son-in-law’s parents. Indeed, that may be the simplest and clearest way to introduce them.

This is the difference between a marriage and consanguinity for blood relations. Is it legit to call a close of a relative at the case of marriage a person called, “Rother has affinal kin”?

A pill is “a disagreeable or tiresome person,” often because he is a square (overly conventional) or a Debbie Downer (overly negative).

People were not witty and charismatic in John F. Kennedy’s moment of truth. But they spoke in the words of Jesus as a pill. So he chose the role of a pill, rather than a pill. Is it not idiomatic, but just colorful?

If I were to experiment with irony, I would start with some simple root words and then use to decorate it with excess suffixes. Which words are suggested by thesaurus? Why? I like undecipherable best for adding two prefixes meaning “not” to an Arabic root meaning “nought.” ”

“Even when the earth has a dark side, it can end up getting nothing but a white piece”” – “Do the brown stuff’s end”