Is it

excessive to guzzle eat all

your dishes?

The phrase in order to connotes enabling

enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.

The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I

work to have the means of survival The

phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I

made my comments for the sake of harmony.

My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.

There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it

not there?

Is it

excessive to guzzle eat all

your dishes?

The phrase in order to connotes enabling

enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.

The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I

work to have the means of survival The

phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I

made my comments for the sake of harmony.

My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.

There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it

not there?

Is it

excessive to guzzle eat all

your dishes?

Is it

excessive to guzzle eat all

your dishes?

Is it

excessive to guzzle eat all

your dishes?

The phrase in order to connotes enabling

enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.

The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I

work to have the means of survival The

phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I

made my comments for the sake of harmony.

My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.

There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it

not there?

The phrase in order to connotes enabling

enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.

The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I

work to have the means of survival The

phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I

made my comments for the sake of harmony.

My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.

There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it

not there?

Is it

excessive to guzzle eat all

your dishes?