4
Points
Questions
2
Answers
678
-
Asked on June 29, 2021 in Grammar.
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
- 547283 views
- 206 answers
- 202230 votes
-
Asked on June 28, 2021 in Grammar.
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
- 547283 views
- 206 answers
- 202230 votes
-
Asked on June 28, 2021 in Grammar.
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
- 547283 views
- 206 answers
- 202230 votes
-
Asked on June 28, 2021 in Grammar.
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
- 547283 views
- 206 answers
- 202230 votes
-
Asked on June 28, 2021 in Grammar.
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
- 547283 views
- 206 answers
- 202230 votes
-
Asked on June 28, 2021 in Grammar.
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
- 547283 views
- 206 answers
- 202230 votes
-
Asked on June 28, 2021 in Grammar.
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
- 547283 views
- 206 answers
- 202230 votes
-
Asked on June 28, 2021 in Grammar.
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
- 547283 views
- 206 answers
- 202230 votes
-
Asked on June 28, 2021 in Grammar.
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
- 547283 views
- 206 answers
- 202230 votes
-
Asked on June 27, 2021 in Grammar.
The phrase in order to connotes enabling
enabling I work in order to have the means of survival.
The phrasing is relatively stiff in most cases, and same concept can usually be expressed with to I
work to have the means of survival The
phrase for the sake of indicates benefit or support I
made my comments for the sake of harmony.
My comments will not necessarily cause harmony, but should help.
There are cases where either construction might’ve worked, but there are some subtle differences. If there is a temporal distinction, why is it
not there?
- 547283 views
- 206 answers
- 202230 votes