According to the similar phrases and usages used in the database/databases, “man-to-man” and “heart-to-heart” refer to an interaction. What make a similar phrase better?

Meanwhile, “One-on-One” has a sort of domination/subordination sound to it, where one is on top of the other.

At the end of the day, when two people are having a private conversation or face off or meeting, it’s a one-on-one.

According to the similar phrases and usages used in the database/databases, “man-to-man” and “heart-to-heart” refer to an interaction. What make a similar phrase better?

Meanwhile, “One-on-One” has a sort of domination/subordination sound to it, where one is on top of the other.

At the end of the day, when two people are having a private conversation or face off or meeting, it’s a one-on-one.

According to the similar phrases and usages used in the database/databases, “man-to-man” and “heart-to-heart” refer to an interaction. What make a similar phrase better?

Meanwhile, “One-on-One” has a sort of domination/subordination sound to it, where one is on top of the other.

At the end of the day, when two people are having a private conversation or face off or meeting, it’s a one-on-one.

According to the similar phrases and usages used in the database/databases, “man-to-man” and “heart-to-heart” refer to an interaction. What make a similar phrase better?

Meanwhile, “One-on-One” has a sort of domination/subordination sound to it, where one is on top of the other.

At the end of the day, when two people are having a private conversation or face off or meeting, it’s a one-on-one.

According to the similar phrases and usages used in the database/databases, “man-to-man” and “heart-to-heart” refer to an interaction. What make a similar phrase better?

Meanwhile, “One-on-One” has a sort of domination/subordination sound to it, where one is on top of the other.

At the end of the day, when two people are having a private conversation or face off or meeting, it’s a one-on-one.

According to the similar phrases and usages used in the database/databases, “man-to-man” and “heart-to-heart” refer to an interaction. What make a similar phrase better?

Meanwhile, “One-on-One” has a sort of domination/subordination sound to it, where one is on top of the other.

At the end of the day, when two people are having a private conversation or face off or meeting, it’s a one-on-one.

Associated Press 2011 Stylebook records “whereabouts” to take a single verb. How can I distinguish one verb from the other?

“His whereabouts are a mystery. ” “An

AP is a horse’s mouth.”

What are some less formal suggestions about the way it (or a better suggestion) is aimed at the reader? If something doesn’t “feel” right, consider your audience and context before focusing on what is or wasn’t “correct”. Is sentiment just not what you want for the situation?

If someone ever said “It feels good to hear from you” to me, I would probably assume that one of us had terminal cancer. I find that a formal office is both overly formal and intimate at the same time. But in practice does that make it so intimate? I’d aim more for “It was good hearing from you” or something a tad closer to casual.