You might tackle the next activity, if you mean to get to go after a difficult task

with gusto: He completed the reports, then tackled the accounts.
We’ve discussed vacation—now let’s tackle the salaries.

You might also address or focus on the next thing. Other interesting things. Or, to more strongly show that you have moved from one task and started another, you could set about discussing the salaries or apply yourself to reconciling the

accounts.

You might tackle the next activity, if you mean to get to go after a difficult task

with gusto: He completed the reports, then tackled the accounts.
We’ve discussed vacation—now let’s tackle the salaries.

You might also address or focus on the next thing. Other interesting things. Or, to more strongly show that you have moved from one task and started another, you could set about discussing the salaries or apply yourself to reconciling the

accounts.

Often the English lexicon is used to refer to President Obama as “President X” on first reference, and thereafter as “Mr. X”. When

an information is released about the

second reference to national public radio (NSR) it is offensive. This is not new. NPR has used the name “Frederick Ford” from the mid-1970s to the 1970s. We were told he was a “Mr.” Is the president the only one whom NPR routinely refers to with the Mr. honorific on second reference? If NPR is reporting on James Hamilton, an Ohio car dealer, that’s the issue on second reference, not Mr. Hamilton, it will be Hamilton the story.

This is the policy of the New York Times and all of the articles on this website are about Fillmore as President on first reference. is it misleading to cite a September 18. 1851 New York Times story (PDF)?