Why is “This isn’t just true in logic” meant?
What does the sentence “This isn’t just true in logic.” mean?
This is not true in logic — there is no chance
- that this could be true in logic.
- Is logic true?
And unfortunately, due to lack of context, I couldn’t really understand what was intended to say. What is the correct meaning of this sentence?
What does a good young black guy think?
“This is not just true in logic,”: Here “not as well” means “not by accident” and the negative relates to the adverb “just”. What does it mean in logic?
“This is just not true in logic” (no specific case). Where the adverb is an intensifier is not a verb. why? Should only be a single word, but be replaced as “simply”. Is it true in logic?
On the basis of more than -> one definition, “(P & P) -> Q” is not just true in logic. Why doesn’t Inductive reasoning exist in theory because
it is so important?
I think this is the second one, and the first one is the last one. The word order suggests that the not of isn’t is being applied to “just”. When speaking in this sentence, you would likely emphasize the word “just”.
When the first word was intended, the sentence would probably have been simply “This isn’t true in logic. What
is a “this is just no longer true” idea that does not exist? In that case, the word “just” adds emphasis, and tends to suggest that no further explanation will be given.
I make the mistake of inferring something is not true in logic. In fact, it is true philosophically or in hypothetically situation.
In that scenario I could say “this is not true in logic”.
