Are these sentences written by Thomas Kuhn grammatically correct?
I’m almost certain that Kuhn wouldn’t publish an essay with grammatical mistakes but those two sentences seem plain wrong to me. This argument does require that I
illustrate them briefly, my views will begin to depart from those long current only after I have done so.
What is the tamest part of this sentence?
My critic asserts, however, that there’s one value of p, as in subjective choice, and he believes that all rational members of the group must arrive at it.
In my opinion the third comma needs to be removed and a “is” needs to be inserted after the second “that”?
Both sentences are correct although infelicitous.
Though my argument does require that I illustrate them briefly, my views will commence to depart from those long current only after I have them.
My critic asserts, however, that the ‘value’ p is the value of true objective choice; and he believes that all more rational members of the group must arrive at it.
For the first time, we can compare and contrast photo series.
Both sentences are correct although infelicitous.
Though my argument does require that I illustrate them briefly, my views will commence to depart from those long current only after I have them.
My critic asserts, however, that the ‘value’ p is the value of true objective choice; and he believes that all more rational members of the group must arrive at it.
For the first time, we can compare and contrast photo series.
Both sentences are correct although infelicitous.
Though my argument does require that I illustrate them briefly, my views will commence to depart from those long current only after I have them.
My critic asserts, however, that the ‘value’ p is the value of true objective choice; and he believes that all more rational members of the group must arrive at it.
For the first time, we can compare and contrast photo series.
Both sentences are correct although infelicitous.
Though my argument does require that I illustrate them briefly, my views will commence to depart from those long current only after I have them.
My critic asserts, however, that the ‘value’ p is the value of true objective choice; and he believes that all more rational members of the group must arrive at it.
For the first time, we can compare and contrast photo series.
Both sentences are correct although infelicitous.
Though my argument does require that I illustrate them briefly, my views will commence to depart from those long current only after I have them.
My critic asserts, however, that the ‘value’ p is the value of true objective choice; and he believes that all more rational members of the group must arrive at it.
For the first time, we can compare and contrast photo series.
