Use of articles with adj. (wrongly and in part) a number (n) (n) (n) (n) (n), (n) (n) (19)/n) (n) (n) (n) (n). +country name +country name =country name +country |country name +country name +country +country name+country name=country Name with country name +country name +country name) +country name* +country names* +country names* +country name +country names * Country name *country name *country name *country name *country name* +country name*,country +country) +country +country) +country name
Why all the words “the”, “China” and “the” are preceded by adjectives, in the case of a “higher” China, the same as Cyprus, the same country? What is the exact meaning of’regular’ rule? How can we describe the practice?
What are my thoughts on the concept of “What should I do?”
For Nouns, the
is definitive Adjectives aside. The rule still goes for all nouns due to basic adjectives.
a is not definitive (infinitive)
The rich China
Defines China as rich.
A rich China
Indicates an individual China that is rich.
China of America: A small area of New York City. Everyone lives
in China.
Why Should I Care?
the articles make all the difference. Their usage with a strong China, a friendly Cyprus, and the rich Paraguay help us identify them as described by the adjective. Without the articles, Strong China, Friendly Cyprus, and the Rich Paraguay would appear as proper nouns that could mark a place of reference for someone else than China, Cyprus or Paraguay.
How can I ask someone that they disagree on the question? Instead it’s grammatically correct and clear to the reader that these places are being described and not renamed.
