“The quiet, damaged hot guy” — Order of adjectives. The chaotic, hot man in a. “The cute man”, not “the flaming guy”
Say,
at age 17, I know a guy named Frank. I know several men named Frank’s. And if I understand the guy best, I know him very well.
- He’s hot so it’s funny why he’s so hot?
- He’s surprisingly quiet. How does he feel?
- And, he’s permanently damaged.
I don’t know if he’s from the USA or a friend of
mine. I don’t know him. He asks me and when the phone rings, he calls himself and tells me that what he is, Frank, is me. Hey, some idiots know him…. He is the quiet guy. He is damaged because he has been in an argument for three weeks.
This order of adjectives sounds the most natural to me. “The damaged quiet hot guy” or The hot quiet damaged guy sound ridiculous to me.
What is the reason behind the movement?
And I suppose adjectives “quiet” and “damaged” here describe “hot guy” as a whole.
I remember being taught a formula for the order of adjectives in 5th grade. I remember being taught a formula for adjectives. I recall being taught a formula for adjectives at the age of 7. How come I don’t remember my memory or any thoughts about my childhood. Is there something like, “Adjectives of Taste Before adjr. “, as I remember, “,? Of quality before etc. “etc”.
In a systematic way, nouns and adjectives are given. According to Mark Forsyth’s book opinion-size-age-shape-colour-obtained-material-use., here’s the order of adjectives.
Which is more useful in this particular case since quiet, damaged and hot all have the same description. What are some great quotes you said in Quiet, though? Damaged could either be a metaphorical shape, or an opinion, too (your opinion, that he is damaged)? In that sentence, I should be talking about ‘hot’, as opposed to ‘hot’, ultimately confirming my order.
What is the only explanation I have ever broken up with? If you think for a minute you have an intuition can you justify it? If I could get a quiet, damage hot guy, I would probably not be right. Quiet, damaged hot guy sounds better to me ears. What determines rhythm of sentence in English to be useful?
Im not sure whether to stand for hot stands in contrast to quiet and damaged in your sentence. I’m not sure why you say Frank is hot in spite of the fact that he’s quiet and damaged. Is there just a reason? Therefore, if I were writing this, I’d probably break the list of adjectives into two, so they could be properly contrasted:
That’s Frank. What if he’s hot, but he’s quiet and damaged?
What was the name of Frank? He’s quiet and disabled – but he’s hot.
What makes Frank so hot?
The old boy is quiet and cold, but he’s damaged.
If all the adjectives are negative or positive, we can string them together.
I’m going to scrap my old, beat up, loud pickup truck.
What adjective can you use between positive and negative?
It’s old, beat-up, and loud, but it’s reliable.
Is that good over: I’m
going to scrap my old, reliable, beat-up, loud pickup truck.
Why I don’t find reliable in that list of descriptors especially useful.
In a systematic way, nouns and adjectives are given. According to Mark Forsyth’s book opinion-size-age-shape-colour-obtained-material-use., here’s the order of adjectives.
Which is more useful in this particular case since quiet, damaged and hot all have the same description. What are some great quotes you said in Quiet, though? Damaged could either be a metaphorical shape, or an opinion, too (your opinion, that he is damaged)? In that sentence, I should be talking about ‘hot’, as opposed to ‘hot’, ultimately confirming my order.
What is the only explanation I have ever broken up with? If you think for a minute you have an intuition can you justify it? If I could get a quiet, damage hot guy, I would probably not be right. Quiet, damaged hot guy sounds better to me ears. What determines rhythm of sentence in English to be useful?
In a systematic way, nouns and adjectives are given. According to Mark Forsyth’s book opinion-size-age-shape-colour-obtained-material-use., here’s the order of adjectives.
Which is more useful in this particular case since quiet, damaged and hot all have the same description. What are some great quotes you said in Quiet, though? Damaged could either be a metaphorical shape, or an opinion, too (your opinion, that he is damaged)? In that sentence, I should be talking about ‘hot’, as opposed to ‘hot’, ultimately confirming my order.
What is the only explanation I have ever broken up with? If you think for a minute you have an intuition can you justify it? If I could get a quiet, damage hot guy, I would probably not be right. Quiet, damaged hot guy sounds better to me ears. What determines rhythm of sentence in English to be useful?
Im not sure whether to stand for hot stands in contrast to quiet and damaged in your sentence. I’m not sure why you say Frank is hot in spite of the fact that he’s quiet and damaged. Is there just a reason? Therefore, if I were writing this, I’d probably break the list of adjectives into two, so they could be properly contrasted:
That’s Frank. What if he’s hot, but he’s quiet and damaged?
What was the name of Frank? He’s quiet and disabled – but he’s hot.
What makes Frank so hot?
The old boy is quiet and cold, but he’s damaged.
If all the adjectives are negative or positive, we can string them together.
I’m going to scrap my old, beat up, loud pickup truck.
What adjective can you use between positive and negative?
It’s old, beat-up, and loud, but it’s reliable.
Is that good over: I’m
going to scrap my old, reliable, beat-up, loud pickup truck.
Why I don’t find reliable in that list of descriptors especially useful.
