I would suggest to the same way that ‘anyone’ is to ‘any’, ‘each one can be to…each’, so the following constructions probably provide the most succinct way of saying that you want a response giving objections against each person: What are each

one’s objections? What are the objections for each one?

‘Each’ can be a pronoun as well as an adjective or an adverb, but it doesn’t have a possessive form, even though ‘each’s’ is permissible according to standard English grammar – in the same way that you can create a past participle out of a verb ifinitive by ‘-ed’, as a weak verb, until there is a strong verb alternative. As there is no strong alternative for ‘each’, there’s nothing stopping you putting an apostrophe’s’ after ‘each’ to create a possessive form. Except for it sounding awkward because it is not a form one hears in practice. What happens if a grammar zealot stops a language from evolving from the unofficial to the actual language?

Is there any way to explain why just so many people are complaining about it?

What are your objections? You

use “each of them” to mean individual, not objections. You can pronounce the plural possessive. Them is the objective case of the pronoun they. An objection to me wouldn’t

be grammatical, but it’s not in my head.

How to structure a statement will not only depend on the goal of the statement itself, but also on the body of text which surrounds it. In all cases, you must indicate who “they” or “them” are, either in this statement or another. Since this, I assume you are referring to a group of individuals, such must be identified in close proximity.

For my direct answer, “them’s”, “each’s,” is not possessive form. Now what is the meaning of each of these words?

What are the objections

to each individual?

What

are the objections? How individual was defined in the preceding text. From each individual

being a person. (Depending on his/her individuality.)