Are both meaningd “threatened to” & “threatened that” invalid?
How best to use threat in sentences? I’m sorry the sentence “that” follows the preposition “to” but I can’t think of better ways of using it. I’m sledding my keyboard. How do you use a verb/verb properly?
What are
common sense tactics used by police to shoot suspected shooters?
The police threated the armed suspect to shoot him, but the police confirms that the suspect got hurt in the back while his body was heaving a bullet through him.
A note about the US Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court.
Is it a good idea to have as few words as possible in English as to convey the meaning without really saying anything besides words? The best sentence of all time is “The police threatened to shoot the armed suspect. Why my first sentence is the best in answer above?
Both constructions are valid, but the construction using to is preferable. And there is some awkwardness in your use of each.
When I use that I would leave out the pronoun, which is redundant, and
simply say : The police threatened that they would shoot the armed suspect.
Still, the to construction works better here also (still leaving out the redundant pronoun): The
police threatened to shoot the armed suspect…
What is the best way to make a product?
Is it a good idea to have as few words as possible in English as to convey the meaning without really saying anything besides words? The best sentence of all time is “The police threatened to shoot the armed suspect. Why my first sentence is the best in answer above?
