A word for an object containing two evolutionarily related objects that may be more likely to evolve.
What to call the animal that came before ape and humans?
What are the basics of a good friendship?
If I understand you, you might be talking about – evolution branch, more specifically and technically correct – you might be talking about bio classification (see also taxonomic rank).
Are apes and humans in the superfamily of hominoidea?
If I understand you, you might be talking about – evolution branch, more specifically and technically correct – you might be talking about bio classification (see also taxonomic rank).
Are apes and humans in the superfamily of hominoidea?
Is the same
as a number of other similar commonality situations in which it appears similar in nature?
Is the same
as a number of other similar commonality situations in which it appears similar in nature?
If I understand you, you might be talking about – evolution branch, more specifically and technically correct – you might be talking about bio classification (see also taxonomic rank).
Are apes and humans in the superfamily of hominoidea?
Biologists often refer to a “common ancestor” when referring to a species which no longer exists, but from which two or more other species have evolved instead.
Small for Digital comments. Do we know the most recent common ancestor?
Why is the word progenitor searched? This word is commonly used to describe or explain a species that could have been created from another specie. In the modern hominid species, Australopithecus is the family member of Australopithecus, while the genus Australopithecus is the earliest species. Moreover, Australopithecus also comes from a very different species, so his use is unnecessary. “I
could not find anything to understand the meaning of this statement.”
Why is the word progenitor searched? This word is commonly used to describe or explain a species that could have been created from another specie. In the modern hominid species, Australopithecus is the family member of Australopithecus, while the genus Australopithecus is the earliest species. Moreover, Australopithecus also comes from a very different species, so his use is unnecessary. “I
could not find anything to understand the meaning of this statement.”
If I understand you, you might be talking about – evolution branch, more specifically and technically correct – you might be talking about bio classification (see also taxonomic rank).
Are apes and humans in the superfamily of hominoidea?
If I understand you, you might be talking about – evolution branch, more specifically and technically correct – you might be talking about bio classification (see also taxonomic rank).
Are apes and humans in the superfamily of hominoidea?
